SynthesisScientific reports2015
Prognostic value of meta-signature miRNAs in renal cell carcinoma: an integrated miRNA expression profiling analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Using microRNAs as Novel Predictors of Urologic Cancer Survival: An Integrated Analysis.EBioMedicine · 2018Pooled it
- Clinical utility of microRNA-378 as early diagnostic biomarker of human cancers: a meta-analysis of diagnostic test.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- MicroRNAs as prognostic molecular signatures in renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2015Pooled it
- The mechanism of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling pathway in renal cell carcinoma: current developments and future prospects.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of microRNA Profiling Studies in Chronic Kidney Diseases.Non-coding RNA · 2024Review
- Review
- miRNA Pattern in Hypoxic Microenvironment of Kidney Cancer-Role of PTEN.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Radiogenomics in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review of the Current Status and Future Directions.Cancers · 2022Review
- Review
- miR-198 inhibits the progression of renal cell carcinoma by targeting BIRC5.Cancer cell international · 2021Article
- Review
- Review of Prognostic Expression Markers for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- MicroRNA Profiling of Morphologically Heterogeneous Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Journal of Cancer · 2021Article
- Review
- MicroRNA‑21 contributes to renal cell carcinoma cell invasiveness and angiogenesis via the PDCD4/c‑Jun (AP‑1) signalling pathway.International journal of oncology · 2020Article
- MicroRNA Signature in Renal Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- A Panel of Four-lncRNA Signature as a Potential Biomarker for Predicting Survival in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Journal of Cancer · 2020Article
- Article
- Regulatory Network of Two Tumor-Suppressive Noncoding RNAs Interferes with the Growth and Metastasis of Renal Cell Carcinoma.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2019Article
- Analysis of Expression Patterns of MicroRNAs That Are Closely Associated With Renal Carcinogenesis.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To identify a robust panel of microRNA (miRNA) signatures that can distinguish renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from normal kidney using miRNA expression levels. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis of 29 published studies that compared the miRNA expression profiles of RCC tissues and adjacent normal tissues (NT) to determine candidate miRNAs as prognostic biomarkers for RCC. Using vote-counting strategy and robust rank aggregation method, we identified a statistically significant miRNA meta-signature of two upregulated (miR-21, miR-210) and three downregulated (miR-141, miR-200c and miR-429) miRNAs. X-tile plot was used to generate the optimum cut-off point for the 15 different deregulated miRNAs and Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate CSS. In a cohort of 45 patients, the high expression of miR-21 (HR: 5.46, 95%CI: 2.02-53.39) and miR-210 (HR: 6.85, 95%CI: 2.13-43.36), the low expression of miR-141 (HR: 0.16, 95%CI: 0.004-0.18), miR-200c (HR: 0.08, 95%CI: 0.01-0.43) and miR-429 (HR: 0.18, 95%CI: 0.02-0.50) were associated with poor cancer-specific survival (CSS) following RCC resection. We also constructed a five-miRNAs-based classifier as a reliable prognostic and predictive tool for CSS in patients with RCC, especially in clear cell RCC (ccRCC) (HR: 5.46, 95% CI: 1.51-19.66). This method might facilitate patient counselling and individualise management of RCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.