Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25974133›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2015

Inhibition and Reversal of Microbial Attachment by an Antibody with Parasteric Activity against the FimH Adhesin of Uropathogenic E. coli.

Dagmara I Kisiela, Hovhannes Avagyan, Della Friend, Aachal Jalan, Shivani Gupta, Gianluca Interlandi, Yan Liu, Veronika Tchesnokova, Victoria B Rodriguez, John P Sumida and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Improving the immunogenicity ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Beyond Antibiotics: What the Future Holds.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. The Diversity ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  10. Microbial Genomics: Innovative Targets and Mechanisms.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Strategies to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance: The Example ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. FimH as a scaffold for regulated molecular recognition.Journal of biological engineering · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dagmara I KisielaDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Hovhannes AvagyanDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Della FriendDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Aachal JalanDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Shivani GuptaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Gianluca InterlandiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Yan LiuDepartment of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Veronika TchesnokovaDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Victoria B RodriguezDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
John P SumidaAnalytical Biopharmacy Core, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Roland K StrongDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Xue-Ru WuDepartment of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Wendy E ThomasDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Evgeni V SokurenkoDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
University of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USNew York University · US

Funding

Uroplakins and Baterial InfectionP01DK052206 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SUN, TUNG-TIEN · 1999 to 2015
$19.6M
Dynamic Properties of Bacterial AdhesionsR01AI050940 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SOKURENKO, EVGENI VENIAMINOVIC · 2002 to 2011
$4.7M
BIOCHEMISTRY OF UROTHELIAL DIFFERENTIATIONR01DK039753 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SUN, TUNG-TIEN · 1987 to 2012
$4.6M
ROLE OF TAMM-HORSFALL PROTEIN IN URINARY TRACT DEFENSER01DK056903 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI WU, XUE-RU · 2000 to 2018
$4.6M
Structural analysis of oxidation effects on the hemostatic processK25HL118137 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI INTERLANDI, GIANLUCA · 2013 to 2017
$695k
Antigenic switch in bacterial adhesinsR21AI103846 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SOKURENKO, EVGENI VENIAMINOVIC · 2013 to 2014
$411k
NHLBI NIH HHS K25 HL118137NIAID NIH HHS AI050940NIAID NIH HHS AI103846NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI050940NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI103846NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK052206NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK039753NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK056903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attachment proteins from the surface of eukaryotic cells, bacteria and viruses are critical receptors in cell adhesion or signaling and are primary targets for the development of vaccines and therapeutic antibodies. It is proposed that the ligand-binding pocket in receptor proteins can shift between inactive and active conformations with weak and strong ligand-binding capability, respectively. Here, using monoclonal antibodies against a vaccine target protein - fimbrial adhesin FimH of uropathogenic Escherichia coli, we demonstrate that unusually strong receptor inhibition can be achieved by antibody that binds within the binding pocket and displaces the ligand in a non-competitive way. The non-competitive antibody binds to a loop that interacts with the ligand in the active conformation of the pocket but is shifted away from ligand in the inactive conformation. We refer to this as a parasteric inhibition, where the inhibitor binds adjacent to the ligand in the binding pocket. We showed that the receptor-blocking mechanism of parasteric antibody differs from that of orthosteric inhibition, where the inhibitor replaces the ligand or allosteric inhibition where the inhibitor binds at a site distant from the ligand, and is very potent in blocking bacterial adhesion, dissolving surface-adherent biofilms and protecting mice from urinary bladder infection.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionAdhesins, Escherichia coliAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalFemaleFimbriae, BacterialFimbriae ProteinsMaleMice, Inbred C57BLModels, MolecularUropathogenic Escherichia coliAdhesins, Escherichia coliAntibodies, MonoclonalFimbriae ProteinsfimH protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID25974133
PMCPMC4431754
OpenAlexW331517491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.