ArticleAnalytical chemistry2015
Polymer Coatings in 3D-Printed Fluidic Device Channels for Improved Cellular Adherence Prior to Electrical Lysis.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D-Printed Flexible Microfluidic Health Monitor forACS sensors · 2024Article
- Microfluidics-Based Technologies for the Assessment of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.Cells · 2024Review
- 3D Printing Technology: Role in Safeguarding Food Security.Analytical chemistry · 2024Review
- Unlocking the potential of 3D printed microfluidics for mass spectrometry analysis using liquid infused surfaces.Analytica chimica acta · 2023Article
- Characterization of PDMS Microchannels Using Horizontally or Vertically Formed 3D-Printed Molds by Digital Light Projection.ACS omega · 2023Article
- How 3D printing can boost advances in analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.Mikrochimica acta · 2021Review
- Can 3D Printing Bring Droplet Microfluidics to Every Lab?-A Systematic Review.Micromachines · 2021Review
- Low-cost and open-source strategies for chemical separations.Journal of chromatography. A · 2021Review
- Adhesive bonding strategies to fabricate high-strength and transparent 3D printed microfluidic device.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
- 3D-printed Bioreactors forInternational journal of bioprinting · 2020Review
- Advances in Optical Sensing and Bioanalysis Enabled by 3D Printing.ACS sensors · 2018Review
- The Evolution of Polystyrene as a Cell Culture Material.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2018Review
- Endothelial cell culture in microfluidic devices for investigating microvascular processes.Biomicrofluidics · 2018Article
- Engineering "Endothelialized" Microfluidics for Investigating Vascular and Hematologic Processes Using Non-Traditional Fabrication Techniques.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2018Article
- 3D-Printed Chips: Compatibility of Additive Manufacturing Photopolymeric Substrata with Biological Applications.Micromachines · 2018Review
- 3D-printed Microfluidic Devices: Fabrication, Advantages and Limitations-a Mini Review.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2016Article
- 3D-printed bioanalytical devices.Nanotechnology · 2016Review
- Automated sample preparation in a microfluidic culture device for cellular metabolomics.The Analyst · 2016Article
- Downstream Processing Technologies/Capturing and Final Purification : Opportunities for Innovation, Change, and Improvement. A Review of Downstream Processing Developments in Protein Purification.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This paper describes the design and fabrication of a polyjet-based three-dimensional (3D)-printed fluidic device where poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) or polystyrene (PS) were used to coat the sides of a fluidic channel within the device to promote adhesion of an immobilized cell layer. The device was designed using computer-aided design software and converted into an .STL file prior to printing. The rigid, transparent material used in the printing process provides an optically transparent path to visualize endothelial cell adherence and supports integration of removable electrodes for electrical cell lysis in a specified portion of the channel (1 mm width × 0.8 mm height × 2 mm length). Through manipulation of channel geometry, a low-voltage power source (500 V max) was used to selectively lyse adhered endothelial cells in a tapered region of the channel. Cell viability was maintained on the device over a 5 day period (98% viable), though cell coverage decreased after day 4 with static media delivery. Optimal lysis potentials were obtained for the two fabricated device geometries, and selective cell clearance was achieved with cell lysis efficiencies of 94 and 96%. The bottleneck of unknown surface properties from proprietary resin use in fabricating 3D-printed materials is overcome through techniques to incorporate PDMS and PS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.