Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25973611›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Nuclear species-diagnostic SNP markers mined from 454 amplicon sequencing reveal admixture genomic structure of modern citrus varieties.

Franck Curk, Gema Ancillo, Frédérique Ollitrault, Xavier Perrier, Jean-Pierre Jacquemoud-Collet, Andres Garcia-Lor, Luis Navarro, Patrick Ollitrault

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Diversity of Pummelos (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Essential Oils Obtained from SicilianPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Preferential Disomic Segregation andFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Franck CurkUnité Mixte de Recherche Amélioration Génétique et Adaptation des Plantes (UMR Agap), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (Inra), Centre Inra de Corse, F-20230, San Giuliano, Corsica, France; Centro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (Ivia), 46113, Moncada, Valencia, Spain.
Gema AncilloCentro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (Ivia), 46113, Moncada, Valencia, Spain.
Frédérique OllitraultCentro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (Ivia), 46113, Moncada, Valencia, Spain.
Xavier PerrierUnité Mixte de Recherche Amélioration Génétique et Adaptation des Plantes (UMR Agap), Centre de coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad), TA A-108/02, 34398, Montpellier, Cedex 5, France.
Jean-Pierre Jacquemoud-ColletUnité Mixte de Recherche Amélioration Génétique et Adaptation des Plantes (UMR Agap), Centre de coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad), TA A-108/02, 34398, Montpellier, Cedex 5, France.
Andres Garcia-LorCentro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (Ivia), 46113, Moncada, Valencia, Spain.
Luis NavarroCentro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (Ivia), 46113, Moncada, Valencia, Spain.
Patrick OllitraultCentro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (Ivia), 46113, Moncada, Valencia, Spain; Unité Mixte de Recherche Amélioration Génétique et Adaptation des Plantes (UMR Agap), Centre de coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (Cirad), Station de Roujol, 97170, Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most cultivated Citrus species originated from interspecific hybridisation between four ancestral taxa (C. reticulata, C. maxima, C. medica, and C. micrantha) with limited further interspecific recombination due to vegetative propagation. This evolution resulted in admixture genomes with frequent interspecific heterozygosity. Moreover, a major part of the phenotypic diversity of edible citrus results from the initial differentiation between these taxa. Deciphering the phylogenomic structure of citrus germplasm is therefore essential for an efficient utilization of citrus biodiversity in breeding schemes. The objective of this work was to develop a set of species-diagnostic single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers for the four Citrus ancestral taxa covering the nine chromosomes, and to use these markers to infer the phylogenomic structure of secondary species and modern cultivars. Species-diagnostic SNPs were mined from 454 amplicon sequencing of 57 gene fragments from 26 genotypes of the four basic taxa. Of the 1,053 SNPs mined from 28,507 kb sequence, 273 were found to be highly diagnostic for a single basic taxon. Species-diagnostic SNP markers (105) were used to analyse the admixture structure of varieties and rootstocks. This revealed C. maxima introgressions in most of the old and in all recent selections of mandarins, and suggested that C. reticulata × C. maxima reticulation and introgression processes were important in edible mandarin domestication. The large range of phylogenomic constitutions between C. reticulata and C. maxima revealed in mandarins, tangelos, tangors, sweet oranges, sour oranges, grapefruits, and orangelos is favourable for genetic association studies based on phylogenomic structures of the germplasm. Inferred admixture structures were in agreement with previous hypotheses regarding the origin of several secondary species and also revealed the probable origin of several acid citrus varieties. The developed species-diagnostic SNP marker set will be useful for systematic estimation of admixture structure of citrus germplasm and for diverse genetic studies.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAllelesChromosome MappingCitrusGenetic VariationGenotypePhylogenyPrincipal Component AnalysisSequence Analysis, DNASpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID25973611
PMCPMC4431842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.