Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25973526›Full record

Trial reportJournal of palliative medicine2015

Fixed-Dose Subcutaneous Methylnaltrexone in Patients with Advanced Illness and Opioid-Induced Constipation: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study and Open-Label Extension.

Janet Bull, Charles V Wellman, Robert J Israel, Andrew C Barrett, Craig Paterson, William P Forbes

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of palliative medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. The influence of brain metastases on the central nervous system effects of methylnaltrexone: a post hoc analysis of 3 randomized, double-blind studies.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. The MOVEMENT Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Treatment with methylnaltrexone is associated with increased survival in patients with advanced cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2016
    Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Clinical Outcomes of Intravenous Methylnaltrexone in Children: A Single-Arm Retrospective Cohort Study.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Management of Constipation in Hospitalized Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Methylnaltrexone for Opioid-Induced Dysmotility in Critically Ill Infants and Children: A Pilot Study.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Constipation in Cancer Patients - an Update of Clinical Evidence.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janet Bull1 Four Seasons , Flat Rock, North Carolina.
Charles V Wellman2 Hospice of the Western Reserve , Cleveland, Ohio.
Robert J Israel3 Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Tarrytown, New York.
Andrew C Barrett4 Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. , Raleigh, North Carolina.
Craig Paterson4 Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. , Raleigh, North Carolina.
William P Forbes4 Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. , Raleigh, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubcutaneous methylnaltrexone (MNTX), dosed based on body weight, is efficacious and well tolerated in inducing bowel movements in patients with advanced illness and opioid-induced constipation (OIC); however, fixed-dose administration of MNTX may improve ease of administration.

objectiveThe study objective was to assess safety and efficacy of fixed-dose MNTX in two phase 4 trials.

methodsIn a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (RCT), patients with advanced illness and OIC received MNTX (8 mg or 12 mg by body weight [38 kg to <62 kg or ≥62 kg, respectively]) or placebo every other day (QOD) for two weeks. Patients completing the RCT could enroll in an open-label extension (OLE) study with MNTX administered as needed (PRN). The primary endpoint was percentage of patients with a rescue-free bowel movement (RFBM) within four hours after ≥2 of the first 4 doses in the first week.

resultsIn the RCT, 116 and 114 patients received MNTX and placebo, respectively, and 149 patients continued to the OLE study. The percentage of patients achieving primary endpoint was 62.9% and 9.6% for MNTX and placebo groups, respectively (p<0.0001). Median time to RFBM after the first dose was 0.8 hour and 23.6 hours in MNTX and placebo groups, respectively (p<0.0001). Efficacy results during the OLE study were consistent with the RCT. MNTX demonstrated a favorable safety profile in the RCT and OLE study.

conclusionFixed-dose MNTX administered QOD in the RCT and PRN in the OLE study demonstrated robust efficacy and was well tolerated in treating OIC in patients with advanced illness.

Indexed as

AgedAnalgesics, OpioidConstipationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsPatient SafetyPlacebosQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsSeverity of Illness IndexAnalgesics, OpioidmethylnaltrexoneNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsPlacebosQuaternary Ammonium Compounds

Identifiers

PMID25973526
PMCPMC4492709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.