ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2015
Profile of differentially expressed intratumoral cytokines to predict the immune-polarizing side effects of tamoxifen in breast cancer treatment.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Prognostic and tumor-immune infiltration cell signatures in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancers.Gland surgery · 2021Article
- Prognostic Impact of Immunoglobulin Kappa C (Cancers · 2021Article
- The immunomodulatory effects of endocrine therapy in breast cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021Review
- Effects of Jaeumkanghwa-tang on tamoxifen responsiveness in preclinical ER+ breast cancer model.Endocrine-related cancer · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Factors within the tissue of breast cancer (BC) may shift the polarization of CD4+ T cells towards Th2 direction. This tendency can promote tumor development and be enhanced by the use of tamoxifen during the treatment. Thus, the patients with low levels of tumor-induced Th2 polarization prior to tamoxifen treatment may better endure the immune-polarizing side effects (IPSE) of tamoxifen and have better prognoses. Estimation of Th2 polarization status should help predict the IPSE among tamoxifen-treated patients and guide the use of tamoxifen among all BC patients before the tamoxifen therapy. Here, we report profiling of differentially expressed (DE) intratumoral cytokines as a signature to evaluate the IPSE of tamoxifen. The DE genes of intratumoral CD4+ T cells (CD4 DEGs) were identified by gene expression profiles of purified CD4+ T cells from BC patients and validated by profiling of cultured intratumoral CD4+ T cells. Functional enrichment analyses showed a directed Th2 polarization of intratumoral CD4+ T cells. To find the factors inducing the Th2 polarization of CD4+ T cells, we identified 995 common DE genes of bulk BC tissues (BC DEGs) by integrating five independent datasets. Five DE cytokines observed in bulk BC tissues with dysregulated receptors in the intratumoral CD4+ T cells were selected as the predictor of the IPSE of tamoxifen. The patients predicted to suffer low IPSE (low Th2 polarization) had a significantly lower distant relapse risk than the patients predicted to suffer high IPSE in independent datasets (n = 608; HR = 4.326, P = 0.000897; HR = 2.014, P = 0.0173; HR = 2.72, P = 0.04077). Patients predicted to suffer low IPSE would benefit from tamoxifen treatment (HR = 2.908, P = 0.03905). The DE intratumoral cytokines identified in this study may help predict the IPSE of tamoxifen and justify the use of tamoxifen in BC treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25973310PMC4396041W2405425475What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.