Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25973306›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2015

A specific KRAS codon 13 mutation is an independent predictor for colorectal cancer metachronous distant metastases.

Qingyang Feng, Li Liang, Li Ren, Jingwen Chen, Ye Wei, Wenju Chang, Dexiang Zhu, Qi Lin, Peng Zheng, Jianmin Xu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exome and transcriptome sequencing identifies loss ofCancer management and research · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qingyang FengDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Li LiangDepartment of Internal Medicine/Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Li RenDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Jingwen ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Ye WeiDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Wenju ChangDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Dexiang ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Qi LinDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Peng ZhengDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Jianmin XuDepartment of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai, China.
Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn colorectal cancer, there are significant differences between synchronous and metachronous distant metastases. However in recent studies, synchronous and metachronous metastases were always lumped together, neglecting their clinical and molecular differences. The mechanism of the latency of metachronous metastases is still unclear. We conducted this study to reveal the relationship between EGFR pathways and metachronous metastases, and try to find efficient predictors.

methodsPCRs and pyrosequencing were used to detect KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and PTEN mutations in primary tumor tissues in a total of 281 patients from 2002 to 2008. Patients were identified into three groups: no-metastases group, synchronous-metastases group and metachronous-metastases group. Clinical and survival data were collected from a prospective database.

resultsKRAS codon 13 mutation was an independent predictor only for metachronous distant metastases (OR = 11.857, P < 0.001), but not for synchronous metastases. Male gender (OR = 2.233, P = 0.024), primary tumor located at rectum (OR = 0.404, P = 0.041), and primary pN2 stage (OR = 3.361, P = 0.01) were also independent predictors for metachronous distant metastases. Different SNPs in KRAS worked significantly different in determining synchronous or metachronous metastases. BRAF mutation (Univariate, OR = 11.5, P = 0.039) and > 200 ng/ml preoperative CEA (Univariate, OR = 41, P = 0.011) potentially predicted metastases within 6 months after primary tumor resection. After metachronous metastases, radical resection (HR = 0.280, P = 0.002) was the most important protective factor for long-term survival.

conclusionThere were significant clinical and molecular differences between synchronous and metachronous metastases. As an independent predictor, KRAS codon 13 mutation might be the key to explain the mechanism of colorectal cancer metachronous distant metastases. Together with clinical characteristics, it could aid in the early detection of metachronous metastases.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerKRAS mutationmetachronous metastasespredictor

Identifiers

PMID25973306
PMCPMC4396022
OpenAlexW2405531513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.