ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2015
Low-cost biportal endoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thoracoscopic ligation by using an extrathoracic looping technique for secondary spontaneous pneumothorax in patients with smoking-induced emphysema.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Commentary: Statewide Variation and Changes in Practices for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax in Maryland, United States: A Retrospective Study.Journal of chest surgery · 2025Article
- Effect of overhang and stiffness on accessibility of catheter tip to lung defects under surgical constraints.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Low-cost of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLike many other countries, including the United States, China faces the problem of rising health care costs, which have become a heavy burden on the state and individuals. Endoscopic surgery offers many benefits. However, the need for more expensive endoscopic consumables brings further high medical costs. Therefore, the development of video-assisted thoracic surgery with no disposable consumables will help to control medical cost escalation.
methodsBetween October 2011 and September 2014, a series of 66 patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax underwent hand ligation of blebs under biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or bullectomy with stapler during triportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. After treatment of blebs, pleural abrasion was performed with an electrocautery cleaning pad.
resultsCompared with the group treated by bullectomy with stapler, we found a significant reduction in postoperative costs in the group with bleb ligation. There was no difference in operating time, chest tube drainage, and postoperative stay between the two groups. The follow-up period varied from 1 to 35 months and six cases of recurrence were noted.
conclusionsThe technique that we described appears to offer better economic results than bullectomy with a stapler under three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for treating primary spontaneous. The clinical outcomes are similar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.