Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25973144›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2015

Under-detection of endospore-forming Firmicutes in metagenomic data.

Sevasti Filippidou, Thomas Junier, Tina Wunderlin, Chien-Chi Lo, Po-E Li, Patrick S Chain, Pilar Junier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Environmentally AcquiredBiomedicines · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sevasti FilippidouLaboratory of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchatel, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Thomas JunierLaboratory of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchatel, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland ; Vital-IT group, Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tina WunderlinLaboratory of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchatel, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Chien-Chi LoBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
Po-E LiBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
Patrick S ChainBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.
Pilar JunierLaboratory of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchatel, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial diversity studies based on metagenomic sequencing have greatly enhanced our knowledge of the microbial world. However, one caveat is the fact that not all microorganisms are equally well detected, questioning the universality of this approach. Firmicutes are known to be a dominant bacterial group. Several Firmicutes species are endospore formers and this property makes them hardy in potentially harsh conditions, and thus likely to be present in a wide variety of environments, even as residents and not functional players. While metagenomic libraries can be expected to contain endospore formers, endospores are known to be resilient to many traditional methods of DNA isolation and thus potentially undetectable. In this study we evaluated the representation of endospore-forming Firmicutes in 73 published metagenomic datasets using two molecular markers unique to this bacterial group (spo0A and gpr). Both markers were notably absent in well-known habitats of Firmicutes such as soil, with spo0A found only in three mammalian gut microbiomes. A tailored DNA extraction method resulted in the detection of a large diversity of endospore-formers in amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA and spo0A genes. However, shotgun classification was still poor with only a minor fraction of the community assigned to Firmicutes. Thus, removing a specific bias in a molecular workflow improves detection in amplicon sequencing, but it was insufficient to overcome the limitations for detecting endospore-forming Firmicutes in whole-genome metagenomics. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of understanding the specific methodological biases that can contribute to improve the universality of metagenomic approaches.

Indexed as

EndosporesgprMetagenomicsProfile analysisspo0A

Identifiers

PMID25973144
PMCPMC4427659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.