ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2015
Pinning synchronization of coupled inertial delayed neural networks.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stability and synchronization for complex-valued neural networks with stochastic parameters and mixed time delays.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- Finite-time and fixed-time synchronization analysis of inertial memristive neural networks with time-varying delays.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2018Article
- Stability and synchronization analysis of inertial memristive neural networks with time delays.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2016Article
- Passivity of memristor-based BAM neural networks with different memductance and uncertain delays.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paper is devoted to the investigation of synchronization for an array of linearly and diffusively coupled inertial delayed neural networks (DNNs). By placing feedback control on a small fraction of network nodes, the entire coupled DNNs can be synchronized to a common objective trajectory asymptotically. Two different analysis methods, including matrix measure strategy and Lyapunov-Krasovskii function approach, are employed to provide sufficient criteria for the synchronization control problem. Comparisons of these two techniques are given at the end of the paper. Finally, an illustrative example is provided to show the effectiveness of the obtained theoretical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.