Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25972913›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2015

Prediction of high-risk types of human papillomaviruses using statistical model of protein "sequence space".

Cong Wang, Yabing Hai, Xiaoqing Liu, Nanfang Liu, Yuhua Yao, Pingan He, Qi Dai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cong WangCollege of Life Sciences, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Yabing HaiCollege of Life Sciences, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Xiaoqing LiuCollege of Sciences, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Nanfang LiuDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China.
Yuhua YaoCollege of Life Sciences, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Pingan HeCollege of Sciences, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Qi DaiCollege of Life Sciences, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China ; Center for Systems Biology, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2675-6511

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discrimination of high-risk types of human papillomaviruses plays an important role in the diagnosis and remedy of cervical cancer. Recently, several computational methods have been proposed based on protein sequence-based and structure-based information, but the information of their related proteins has not been used until now. In this paper, we proposed using protein "sequence space" to explore this information and used it to predict high-risk types of HPVs. The proposed method was tested on 68 samples with known HPV types and 4 samples without HPV types and further compared with the available approaches. The results show that the proposed method achieved the best performance among all the evaluated methods with accuracy 95.59% and F1-score 90.91%, which indicates that protein "sequence space" could potentially be used to improve prediction of high-risk types of HPVs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceCapsid ProteinsComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansModels, StatisticalMolecular Sequence DataMutationOpen Reading FramesPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsReproducibility of ResultsRiskSoftwareCapsid ProteinsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25972913
PMCPMC4418008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.