ArticleFrontiers in genetics2015
Identifying differential transcription factor binding in ChIP-seq.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Human Accelerated Region Drives Opposing Heterochronic Changes in Craniofacial and Limb Development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Genome-wide chromatin profiling reveals a nonlimiting role for RXR in macrophage-like cells stimulated with multiple nuclear receptor agonists.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Oncogenic cell fate decision in breast epithelial cells I: growth factors and mechanisms.Research square · 2026Article
- Selecting ChIP-seq normalization methods from the perspective of their technical conditions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- FOXO4-SP6 axis controls surface epithelium commitment by mediating epigenomic remodeling.Stem cell reports · 2025Article
- A semidominant point mutation of Mediator tail subunit MED5b in Arabidopsis leads to altered enrichment of H3K27me3 and reduced expression of targets of MYC2.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- iPSCs and iPSC-derived cells as a model of human genetic and epigenetic variation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Nuclear speckles regulate functional programs in cancer.Nature cell biology · 2025Article
- Comparison of chromatin accessibility remodeling of granulosa cells in patients with endometrioma or pelvic/tubal infertility.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Oncogenic role of RARG rearrangements in acute myeloid leukemia resembling acute promyelocytic leukemia.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Pervasive RNA-binding protein enrichment on TAD boundaries regulates TAD organization.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- 3D chromatin hubs as regulatory units of identity and survival in human acute leukemia.Molecular cell · 2025Article
- Comprehensive single-cell aging atlas of healthy mammary tissues reveals shared epigenomic and transcriptomic signatures of aging and cancer.Nature aging · 2025Article
- Retinoic acid drives surface epithelium fate determination through the TCF7-MSX2 axis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Article
- Nuclear lamin A/C phosphorylation by loss of androgen receptor leads to cancer-associated fibroblast activation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Characterization of the distribution and dynamics of chromatin states in theGenome research · 2024Article
- The single-cell transcriptomic atlas and RORA-mediated 3D epigenomic remodeling in driving corneal epithelial differentiation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- SGF29 nuclear condensates reinforce cellular aging.Cell discovery · 2023Article
- Comprehensive single cell aging atlas of mammary tissues reveals shared epigenomic and transcriptomic signatures of aging and cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ChIP seq is a widely used assay to measure genome-wide protein binding. The decrease in costs associated with sequencing has led to a rise in the number of studies that investigate protein binding across treatment conditions or cell lines. In addition to the identification of binding sites, new studies evaluate the variation in protein binding between conditions. A number of approaches to study differential transcription factor binding have recently been developed. Several of these methods build upon established methods from RNA-seq to quantify differences in read counts. We compare how these new approaches perform on different data sets from the ENCODE project to illustrate the impact of data processing pipelines under different study designs. The performance of normalization methods for differential ChIP-seq depends strongly on the variation in total amount of protein bound between conditions, with total read count outperforming effective library size, or variants thereof, when a large variation in binding was studied. Use of input subtraction to correct for non-specific binding showed a relatively modest impact on the number of differential peaks found and the fold change accuracy to biological validation, however a larger impact might be expected for samples with more extreme copy number variations between them. Still, it did identify a small subset of novel differential regions while excluding some differential peaks in regions with high background signal. These results highlight proper scaling for between-sample data normalization as critical for differential transcription factor binding analysis and suggest bioinformaticians need to know about the variation in level of total protein binding between conditions to select the best analysis method. At the same time, validation using fold-change estimates from qRT-PCR suggests there is still room for further method improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.