ReviewFrontiers in immunology2015
Pseudotype-based neutralization assays for influenza: a systematic analysis.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of neutralization assays performed using live SARS-CoV-2 virus and pseudovirus to assess immunogenicity of a bivalent SARS-CoV-2 protein vaccine in humans.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Trial
- A replication-competent adenovirus-vectored influenza vaccine induces durable systemic and mucosal immunity.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021Trial
- Consensus H3N2 HA immunogens incorporating key antigenic mutations elicit broad-spectrum neutralizing responses.Emerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
- Filovirus reactive antibodies in wildlife hunting communities suggest ongoing zoonotic spillover in forested Guinea.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Host cell entry and neutralisation sensitivity of H3N2 influenza A virus subclade K.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- Population immunity to clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 is dominated by anti-neuraminidase antibodies.mBio · 2026Article
- MF59-adjuvanted A/Astrakhan influenza vaccine induces cross-neutralizing H5N1 antibodies in ferrets against circulating clade 2.3.4.4b viruses.NPJ vaccines · 2026Article
- Development and Qualification of a Pseudotyped Virus-Based Microneutralisation Assay for Influenza D Virus.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2026Article
- Nature Inspired Delivery Vehicles for CRISPR-Based Genome Editing.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Computationally designed haemagglutinin with nanocage plug-and-display elicits pan-H5 influenza vaccine responses.Emerging microbes & infections · 2025Article
- Neutralizing activity against bovine H5N1 HPAIV (clade 2.3.4.4b) in human plasma after seasonal influenza vaccination.Emerging microbes & infections · 2025Article
- A system to rapidly develop a bunyavirus pseudotyped virus neutralisation assay for pandemic preparedness.NPJ vaccines · 2025Article
- Pseudovirus-Based Neutralization Assays as Customizable and Scalable Tools for Serological Surveillance and Immune Profiling.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Immunogenicity and safety of a rabies-based highly pathogenic influenza A virus H5 vaccine in cattle.NPJ vaccines · 2025Article
- Exploring the Use of Viral Vectors Pseudotyped with Viral Glycoproteins as Tools to Study Antibody-Mediated Neutralizing Activity.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- A replicating recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus model for dairy cattle H5N1 influenza virus glycoprotein evolution.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Pseudotyped Viruses: A Useful Platform for Pre-Clinical Studies Conducted in a BSL-2 Laboratory Setting.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Antigenic sin and multiple breakthrough infections drive converging evolution of COVID-19 neutralizing responses.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Development of a pseudo-typed virus particle based method to determine the efficacy of virucidal agents.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The use of vaccination against the influenza virus remains the most effective method of mitigating the significant morbidity and mortality caused by this virus. Antibodies elicited by currently licensed influenza vaccines are predominantly hemagglutination-inhibition (HI)-competent antibodies that target the globular head of hemagglutinin (HA) thus inhibiting influenza virus entry into target cells. These antibodies predominantly confer homosubtypic/strain specific protection and only rarely confer heterosubtypic protection. However, recent academia or pharma-led R&D toward the production of a "universal vaccine" has centered on the elicitation of antibodies directed against the stalk of the influenza HA that has been shown to confer broad protection across a range of different subtypes (H1-H16). The accurate and sensitive measurement of antibody responses elicited by these "next-generation" influenza vaccines is, however, hampered by the lack of sensitivity of the traditional influenza serological assays HI, single radial hemolysis, and microneutralization. Assays utilizing pseudotypes, chimeric viruses bearing influenza glycoproteins, have been shown to be highly efficient for the measurement of homosubtypic and heterosubtypic broadly neutralizing antibodies, making them ideal serological tools for the study of cross-protective responses against multiple influenza subtypes with pandemic potential. In this review, we will analyze and compare literature involving the production of influenza pseudotypes with particular emphasis on their use in serum antibody neutralization assays. This will enable us to establish the parameters required for optimization and propose a consensus protocol to be employed for the further deployment of these assays in influenza vaccine immunogenicity studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.