ArticleTheory, culture & society2015
Social Science and Neuroscience beyond Interdisciplinarity: Experimental Entanglements.
Article in Theory, culture & society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemoarchitectural studies of the rat hypothalamus and zona incerta.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Governing beyond the project: Refocusing innovation governance in emerging science and technology funding.Social studies of science · 2024Article
- Engram Studies: A Call for Historical, Philosophical, and Sociological Approaches.Advances in neurobiology · 2024Article
- Is Another kind of Biologization Possible? On Biology and the psy Sciences.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2023Article
- Hope in the era of precision oncology: a qualitative study of informal caregivers' experiences.BMJ open · 2023Article
- The Politics of Clinic and Critique in Southern Brazil.Theory, culture & society · 2022Article
- Politics of Plasticity: Implications of the New Science of the "Teen Brain" for Education.Culture, medicine and psychiatry · 2022Article
- Visualizing Research Trends on Culture Neuroscience (2008-2021): A Bibliometric Analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- The Cognitive-Emotional Design and Study of Architectural Space: A Scoping Review of Neuroarchitecture and Its Precursor Approaches.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Elements of Neuroanthropology.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Review
- Gender Beneath the Skull: Agency, Trauma and Persisting Stereotypes in Neuroepigenetics.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Social scientists' testimony before Congress in the United States between 1946-2016, trends from a new dataset.PloS one · 2020Article
- Crossing Kingdoms: How Can Art Open Up New Ways of Thinking About Science?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Toward Co-productive Learning? The Exchange Network as Experimental Space.Frontiers in sociology · 2019Review
- Better governance, better access: practising responsible data sharing in the METADAC governance infrastructure.Human genomics · 2018Article
- Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance and social responsibility: perspectives from the social sciences.Environmental epigenetics · 2018Review
- Wandering Minds: Tracing Inner Worlds Through a Historical-Geographical Art Installation.GeoHumanities · 2018Article
- Materials library collections as tools for interdisciplinary research.Interdisciplinary science reviews : ISR · 2018Article
- Article
- The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care.PLoS biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article is an account of the dynamics of interaction across the social sciences and neurosciences. Against an arid rhetoric of 'interdisciplinarity', it calls for a more expansive imaginary of what
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.