Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25972582›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Spinal sensory projection neuron responses to spinal cord stimulation are mediated by circuits beyond gate control.

Tianhe C Zhang, John J Janik, Ryan V Peters, Gang Chen, Ru-Rong Ji, Warren M Grill

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05712980 (Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes in RNAseq Data of Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Treated With Different Modalities of Spinal Cord Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05712980 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes in RNAseq Data of Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Treated With Different Modalities of Spinal Cord Stimulation: Looking for Biomarkers of Response and Effectiveness

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital General Universitario de ValenciaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsSpinal Cord Stimulation, Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, Genetic ChangeArmsImplanted pulse generator for SCS with different programming modalities
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Activity of spinal RORβ neurons is related to functional improvements following combination treatment after complete SCI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tianhe C ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina;
John J JanikStryker Corporation, Kalamazoo, Michigan.
Ryan V PetersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina;
Gang ChenDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and.
Ru-Rong JiDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and.
Warren M GrillDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; warren.grill@duke.edu.
Duke University · USStryker (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a therapy used to treat intractable pain with a putative mechanism of action based on the Gate Control Theory. We hypothesized that sensory projection neuron responses to SCS would follow a single stereotyped response curve as a function of SCS frequency, as predicted by the Gate Control circuit. We recorded the responses of antidromically identified sensory projection neurons in the lumbar spinal cord during 1- to 150-Hz SCS in both healthy rats and neuropathic rats following chronic constriction injury (CCI). The relationship between SCS frequency and projection neuron activity predicted by the Gate Control circuit accounted for a subset of neuronal responses to SCS but could not account for the full range of observed responses. Heterogeneous responses were classifiable into three additional groups and were reproduced using computational models of spinal microcircuits representing other interactions between nociceptive and nonnociceptive sensory inputs. Intrathecal administration of bicuculline, a GABAA receptor antagonist, increased spontaneous and evoked activity in projection neurons, enhanced excitatory responses to SCS, and reduced inhibitory responses to SCS, suggesting that GABAA neurotransmission plays a broad role in regulating projection neuron activity. These in vivo and computational results challenge the Gate Control Theory as the only mechanism underlying SCS and refine our understanding of the effects of SCS on spinal sensory neurons within the framework of contemporary understanding of dorsal horn circuitry.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsBicucullineComputer SimulationDisease Models, AnimalGABA-A Receptor AntagonistsLumbar VertebraeMaleMicroelectrodesModels, NeurologicalNeuralgiaNeural InhibitionPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, GABA-ABicucullineGABA-A Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, GABA-Achronic paincomputational modelingGate Control Theoryspinal cord stimulationspinal microcircuits

Identifiers

PMID25972582
PMCPMC4507960
OpenAlexW2130969068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.