Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25972307›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2016

How to estimate exposure when studying the temperature-mortality relationship? A case study of the Paris area.

Laura Schaeffer, Perrine de Crouy-Chanel, Vérène Wagner, Julien Desplat, Mathilde Pascal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Heat-mortality relationship in North Carolina: Comparison using different exposure methods.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biometeorology for cities.International journal of biometeorology · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura SchaefferEnvironmental Health Department, Institut de Veille Sanitaire (French Institute for Public Health Surveillance), Saint-Maurice, France.
Perrine de Crouy-ChanelEnvironmental Health Department, Institut de Veille Sanitaire (French Institute for Public Health Surveillance), Saint-Maurice, France.
Vérène WagnerEnvironmental Health Department, Institut de Veille Sanitaire (French Institute for Public Health Surveillance), Saint-Maurice, France.
Julien DesplatIle-de-France Interregional Centre, Météo-France, Paris, France.
Mathilde PascalEnvironmental Health Department, Institut de Veille Sanitaire (French Institute for Public Health Surveillance), Saint-Maurice, France. m.pascal@invs.sante.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time series studies assessing the effect of temperature on mortality generally use temperatures measured by a single weather station. In the Paris region, there is a substantial measurement network, and a variety of exposure indicators created from multiple stations can be tested. The aim of this study is to test the influence of exposure indicators on the temperature-mortality relationship in the Paris region. The relationship between temperature and non-accidental mortality was assessed based on a time series analysis using Poisson regression and a generalised additive model. Twenty-five stations in Paris and its three neighbouring departments were used to create four exposure indicators. These indicators were (1) the temperature recorded by one reference station, (2) a simple average of the temperatures of all stations, (3) an average weighted on the departmental population and (4) a classification of the stations based on land use and an average weighted on the population in each class. The relative risks and the Akaike criteria were similar for all the exposure indicators. The estimated temperature-mortality relationship therefore did not appear to be significantly affected by the indicator used, regardless of study zone (departments or region) or age group. The increase in temperatures from the 90(th) to the 99(th) percentile of the temperature distribution led to a significant increase in mortality over 75 years (RR = 1.10 [95% CI, 1.07; 1.14]). Conversely, the decrease in temperature between the 10(th) and 1(st) percentile had a significant effect on the mortality under 75 years (RR = 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01; 1.06]). In the Paris area, there is no added value in taking multiple climatic stations into account when estimating exposure in time series studies. Methods to better represent the subtle temperature variations in densely populated areas in epidemiological studies are needed.

Indexed as

MortalityTemperatureAgedAir PollutionHumansHumidityParisRiskClimate changeExposure assessmentHeat waveMortalityTemperature

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.