ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015
Predictions of Visual Content across Eye Movements and Their Modulation by Inferred Information.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semantic anomaly detection in school-aged children during natural sentence reading - A study of fixation-related brain potentials.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Fixation duration on natural scenes is explained by memory encoding not processing demand.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- During natural vision, semantic novelty modulates fixation-related processing in primate cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Eye movements do not preferentially test inferences in the blind spot.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Flash grab effect within the regions of modal and amodal completions.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Saccade execution increases the preview effect with faces: An EEG and eye-tracking coregistration study.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Fast Feature- and Category-Related Parafoveal Previewing Support Free Visual Exploration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Intention-based and sensory-based predictions.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A bias in saccadic suppression of shape change.Vision research · 2021Article
- During natural viewing, neural processing of visual targets continues throughout saccades.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- The extrafoveal preview paradigm as a measure of predictive, active sampling in visual perception.Journal of vision · 2021Review
- The behavioural preview effect with faces is susceptible to statistical regularities: Evidence for predictive processing across the saccade.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- EyeLoop: An Open-Source System for High-Speed, Closed-Loop Eye-Tracking.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021Article
- Coordinating With a Robot Partner Affects Neural Processing Related to Action Monitoring.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Article
- No Evidence for a Role of Spatially Modulated α-Band Activity in Tactile Remapping and Short-Latency, Overt Orienting Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Post-Saccadic Face Processing Is Modulated by Pre-Saccadic Preview: Evidence from Fixation-Related Potentials.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Article
- The Social Situation Affects How We Process Feedback About Our Actions.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Novel ERP Evidence for Processing Differences Between Negative and Positive Polarity Items in German.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The brain is proposed to operate through probabilistic inference, testing and refining predictions about the world. Here, we search for neural activity compatible with the violation of active predictions, learned from the contingencies between actions and the consequent changes in sensory input. We focused on vision, where eye movements produce stimuli shifts that could, in principle, be predicted. We compared, in humans, error signals to saccade-contingent changes of veridical and inferred inputs by contrasting the electroencephalographic activity after saccades to a stimulus presented inside or outside the blind spot. We observed early (<250 ms) and late (>250 ms) error signals after stimulus change, indicating the violation of sensory and associative predictions, respectively. Remarkably, the late response was diminished for blind-spot trials. These results indicate that predictive signals occur across multiple levels of the visual hierarchy, based on generative models that differentiate between signals that originate from the outside world and those that are inferred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.