SynthesisLung2015
The Effectiveness of Anti-leukotriene Agents in Patients with COPD: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Lung, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Eosinophil biology in COPD: from scientific insight to clinical treatment action.ERJ open research · 2026Review
- New insights on pharmacological potential of montelukast: a comprehensive review.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
- A drug screen with approved compounds identifies amlexanox as a novel Wnt/β-catenin activator inducing lung epithelial organoid formation.British journal of pharmacology · 2021Article
- Prescription Status and Clinical Outcomes of Methylxanthines and Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists in Mild-to-Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnti-leukotriene (anti-LT) agents have been not yet established for effectiveness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether anti-LT agents have the responsiveness for COPD patients.
methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register, and Korea Med were searched for relevant clinical trials to review.
resultsSeven studies involving 342 patients were finally analyzed. Pooled estimation from three randomized controlled studies did not demonstrate that anti-LT agents increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s [overall effect: 0.09 L, 95 % confidence interval (CI) -0.04 to 0.21; P = 0.17; I (2) = 41.0 %] or forced vital capacity (overall effect: 0.04 L, 95 % CI -0.04 to 0.11; P = 0.64; I (2) = 0.0 %). As for inflammatory markers, anti-LT agents did not affect the level of myeloperoxidase (standardized mean difference, -0.15; 95 % CI -0.65 to 0.36) or LTB4 (standardized mean difference, -0.41; 95 % CI -0.96 to 0.13). They reduced the frequency of dyspnea [relative risk (RR) 0.43; 95 % CI 0.29 to 0.64] and sputum (RR 0.37; 95 % CI 0.22 to 0.63), based on overall estimation from two non-randomized studies. However, our review revealed that there are few well-designed, randomized controlled studies with large sample sizes and long treatment durations.
conclusionAlthough symptomatic improvements were demonstrated in some studies, there is a lack of evidence to support the therapeutic efficacy of anti-LT agents in patients with COPD. Further large-scale, long-term studies are needed to identify predictive factors for COPD patients who may benefit from anti-LT agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.