Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25971820›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Saudi medicine

Quality of care in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment -elevation myocardial infarction: Gulf RACE 2 experience.

Abdulla Shehab, Khalid Al-Habib, Ahmed Hersi, Husam Al-Faleh, Alawi Alsheikh-Ali, Wael Almahmeed, Kadhim J Suleiman, Ahmed Al-Motarreb, Jassim Al Suwaidy, Nidal Asaad and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Saudi medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Abdulla ShehabA Shehab, MD, Department of Internal Medicine,, College of Medicine and Health Sciences,, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates, T: +971506161028,, F: +97137672 995, a.shehab@uaeu.ac.ae.
Khalid Al-Habib
Ahmed Hersi
Husam Al-Faleh
Alawi Alsheikh-Ali
Wael Almahmeed
Kadhim J Suleiman
Ahmed Al-Motarreb
Jassim Al Suwaidy
Nidal Asaad
Shukri AlSaid
Muhammad Hashim
Haitham Amin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPrimary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) has been recognized as an effective management strategy for acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, there is no first-hand information regarding the quality of pPCI procedures in the Arabian Gulf countries. This study aims to explore the quality of pPCI practice. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: The Gulf Race II was designed as a prospective, multinational, multicentre registry of acute coronary events, focusing on the epidemiology, management practices, and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome. The study recruited consecutive patients aged 18 years and above from 65 hospitals in 6 adjacent Middle Eastern countries (Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Oman, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen). PATIENTS AND

methodsWe used data from the Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE 2). We analyzed data on patients who received pPCI to assess the guidelines-supported performance measure of door-to-balloon (D2B).

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of Health CareRegistriesAdultAgedAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryFemaleHumansIntra-Aortic Balloon PumpingMaleMiddle AgedMiddle EastMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProspective StudiesShock, Cardiogenic

Identifiers

PMID25971820
PMCPMC6074571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.