Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25971704›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Identification of REST targets in the Xenopus tropicalis genome.

Banu Saritas-Yildirim, Christopher P Childers, Christine G Elsik, Elena M Silva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Banu Saritas-YildirimDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, 411 Regents Hall, Washington, DC, 20057, USA. banu.saritas@gmail.com.
Christopher P ChildersDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, 411 Regents Hall, Washington, DC, 20057, USA. genetics.guy@gmail.com.
Christine G ElsikDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, 411 Regents Hall, Washington, DC, 20057, USA. elsikc@missouri.edu.
Elena M SilvaDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, 411 Regents Hall, Washington, DC, 20057, USA. elena.silva@georgetown.edu.
Georgetown University · US

Funding

Regulation of neural development by F-box mediated ubiquitinationR03HD060698 · NICHD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI SILVA, ELENA M · 2010 to 2011
$150k
NICHD NIH HHS HD060698NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD060698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA major role of REST (repressor element-1 silencing transcription factor) is to inhibit the expression of neuronal genes in neural stem cells and non-neuronal cells by binding to a 21 bp consensus sequence and recruiting epigenetic and regulatory cofactors to gene regulatory regions. In neural stem cells, REST silences differentiation-promoting genes to prevent their premature expression and is central to the regulation of neurogenesis and the balance of neural stem cells and neurons.

resultsTo understand the role of REST in vertebrate neurogenesis, we performed a genome-wide screen for REST targets in Xenopus tropicalis. We identified 742 neuron-restrictive silencer elements (NRSE) associated with 1396 genes that are enriched in neuronal function. Comparative analyses revealed that characteristics of NRSE motifs in frog are similar to those in mammals in terms of the distance to target genes, frequency of motifs and the repertoire of putative target genes. In addition, we identified four F-box ubiquitin ligases as putative REST targets and determined that they are expressed in neuronal tissues during Xenopus development.

conclusionWe identified a conserved core of putative target genes in human, mouse and frog that may be fundamental to REST function in vertebrates. We demonstrate that NRSE sites are associated with both protein-coding genes and lncRNAs in the human genome. Furthermore, we demonstrate that REST binding sites are abundant in low gene-occupancy regions of the human genome but this is not due to an increased association with non-coding RNAs. Our findings identify novel targets of REST and broaden the known mechanism of REST-mediated silencing in neurogenesis.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesF-Box ProteinsGene SilencingHumansIn Situ HybridizationMiceNeurogenesisNeuronsRE1-Silencing Transcription FactorRepressor ProteinsRNA, UntranslatedXenopusF-Box ProteinsRE1-Silencing Transcription FactorRepressor ProteinsRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID25971704
PMCPMC4430910
OpenAlexW1538676928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.