ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2015
Evaluation of BRCA1/2 mutational status among German and Austrian women with triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02978495 (Neoadjuvant Carboplatin in Triple Negative Breast Cancer - A Prospective Phase II Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neoadjuvant Carboplatin in Triple Negative Breast Cancer - A Prospective Phase II Study (NACATRINE Trial).
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and safety of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in cancer therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- Transcriptome Profile Analysis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells in Response to a Novel Cytostatic Tetrahydroisoquinoline Compared to Paclitaxel.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- The Relationship of Mutation Carriage ofEuropean journal of breast health · 2021Article
- Novel and recurrent BRCA1/BRCA2 germline mutations in patients with breast/ovarian cancer: a series from the south of Tunisia.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Identification of a novel pathogenic variant inJournal of genomics · 2021Article
- Identification of Eleven NovelFrontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Cancer-Based Criteria for Use in Mainstream BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genetic Testing in Patients With Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2019Article
- Contribution of BRCA1 5382insC mutation in triple negative breast cancer in Tunisia.Journal of translational medicine · 2019Article
- SPAG5 upregulation contributes to enhanced c-MYC transcriptional activity via interaction with c-MYC binding protein in triple-negative breast cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2019Article
- Germline Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Breast Cancer Patients with High Genetic Risk in Turkish Population.International journal of breast cancer · 2019Article
- Article
- Current guidelines for BRCA testing of breast cancer patients are insufficient to detect all mutation carriers.BMC cancer · 2017Article
- Association between basal-like phenotype andCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTesting for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in breast cancer patients is used to identify the risk of second primary cancers and the risk of cancer in the patients' family. Women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are thought to be more likely to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, but most national guidelines for genetic testing, including those used in Germany and Austria, do not consider receptor triple negativity.
methodsWe determined the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations within a cohort of 100 unselected TNBC cases, including patients from Germany and Austria to identify those BRCA-positive patients with a masked family history and who would have been missed due to respective current national guidelines. Double-stranded Sanger sequencing of all exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively, was performed.
resultsWe identified a total of 13 deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and a total of four deleterious mutations in BRCA2. The total rate of deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation carriers was 21 % in our cohort. Six novel mutations, including two deleterious mutations, have been identified, which have not been described in public mutation databases so far. According to current German and Austrian national guidelines for genetic testing, 38.1 and 52.4 %, respectively, of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers would have been overlooked.
conclusionsWe conclude that the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is high in TNBC patients and that BRCA1/2 mutations are not restricted to young women or patients with a positive family history. Receptor triple negativity should therefore be considered in BRCA1/2 genetic testing guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.