ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2015
Factors associated with fecal incontinence in a nationally representative sample of diabetic women.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between resolved hepatitis B virus infection and depression in American adults : a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association between dyslipidemia and depression: a cross-sectional analysis of NHANES data from 2007 to 2018.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Exploring the association between type 2 diabetes and fecal incontinence in american adults: insights from a large cross-sectional study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- Exploring the association between cardiovascular health and bowel health.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Fecal incontinence was associated with depression of any severity: insights from a large cross-sectional study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Article
- Association between constipation and major depression in adult Americans: evidence from NHANES 2005-2010.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Pelvic organ prolapse and anal incontinence in women: screening with a validated epidemiology survey.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
- Effect of gender on the etiology of fecal incontinence: Retrospective analysis of a tertiary referral center in Turkey.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Fecal incontinence in irritable bowel syndrome: Prevalence and associated factors in Swedish and American patients.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2017Article
- Fecal Incontinence: Epidemiology, Impact, and Treatment.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisFecal incontinence (FI) is a debilitating condition that significantly affects quality of life, and has been associated with multiple risk factors. Our goal was to assess the prevalence of FI among diabetic women and evaluate factors associated with FI in this population.
methodsThe National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2005 to 2010 was used to evaluate women with diabetes mellitus and FI. FI was defined as involuntary loss of mucus, liquid, or solid stool at least monthly. Severity was evaluated using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index. Potential risk factors associated with FI were explored with weighted chi-squared statistics. Variables associated with FI in multivariable logistic regression analysis are reported with odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI).
resultsAmong 7,039 women, 13.6 % were diabetic, and 18.1 % of diabetic women reported FI compared to 8.4 % in the overall NHANES population (p < .001). In diabetic women, FI was associated with advancing age (OR 1.3, 95 % CI 1.1 - 1.5), depression (OR 2.0 95 % CI 0.9 - 4.5), poorer health status (OR 1.9, 95 % CI 1.2 - 3.1), urinary incontinence (OR 3.5, 95 % CI 2.1 - 5.9) and bowel movement frequency of ≥21/week (OR 4.9, 95 % CI 2.3 - 10.6) in a multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for race, education level, BMI, comorbidities, prior hysterectomy, and stool consistency.
conclusionsFI affects one in five diabetic women and is strongly associated with high bowel movement frequency, a possible important modifiable factor that should be investigated further in prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.