Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25971614›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2015

Factors associated with fecal incontinence in a nationally representative sample of diabetic women.

Maria De La Luz Nieto, Jennifer M Wu, Catherine Matthews, William E Whitehead, Alayne D Markland

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effect of gender on the etiology of fecal incontinence: Retrospective analysis of a tertiary referral center in Turkey.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Fecal Incontinence: Epidemiology, Impact, and Treatment.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria De La Luz NietoDivision of Urogynecology, Department of Ob/Gyn, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB#7570, 3032 Old Clinics Building, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7570, USA. nieto.luzm@gmail.com.
Jennifer M WuDivision of Urogynecology, Department of Ob/Gyn, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB#7570, 3032 Old Clinics Building, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7570, USA.
Catherine MatthewsDivision of Urogynecology, Department of Ob/Gyn, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB#7570, 3032 Old Clinics Building, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7570, USA.
William E WhiteheadDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Alayne D MarklandBirmingham VAMC GRECC, Birmingham, AL, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USNorth Carolina Division of Public Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisFecal incontinence (FI) is a debilitating condition that significantly affects quality of life, and has been associated with multiple risk factors. Our goal was to assess the prevalence of FI among diabetic women and evaluate factors associated with FI in this population.

methodsThe National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2005 to 2010 was used to evaluate women with diabetes mellitus and FI. FI was defined as involuntary loss of mucus, liquid, or solid stool at least monthly. Severity was evaluated using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index. Potential risk factors associated with FI were explored with weighted chi-squared statistics. Variables associated with FI in multivariable logistic regression analysis are reported with odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI).

resultsAmong 7,039 women, 13.6 % were diabetic, and 18.1 % of diabetic women reported FI compared to 8.4 % in the overall NHANES population (p < .001). In diabetic women, FI was associated with advancing age (OR 1.3, 95 % CI 1.1 - 1.5), depression (OR 2.0 95 % CI 0.9 - 4.5), poorer health status (OR 1.9, 95 % CI 1.2 - 3.1), urinary incontinence (OR 3.5, 95 % CI 2.1 - 5.9) and bowel movement frequency of ≥21/week (OR 4.9, 95 % CI 2.3 - 10.6) in a multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for race, education level, BMI, comorbidities, prior hysterectomy, and stool consistency.

conclusionsFI affects one in five diabetic women and is strongly associated with high bowel movement frequency, a possible important modifiable factor that should be investigated further in prospective studies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes ComplicationsFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysUnited StatesYoung AdultDiabetesFecal incontinenceHealth statusUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID25971614
OpenAlexW2140868955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.