Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25971549›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2015

Evidence That Chlorinated Auxin Is Restricted to the Fabaceae But Not to the Fabeae.

Hong Kiat Lam, Scott A M McAdam, Erin L McAdam, John J Ross

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Auxin Metabolism in Plants.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2021
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Chlorinated Auxins-How DoesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  5. Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hong Kiat LamSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4180-3750
Scott A M McAdamSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
Erin L McAdamSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia.
John J RossSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia john.ross@utas.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3665-2062
University of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auxin is a pivotal plant hormone, usually occurring in the form of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). However, in maturing pea (Pisum sativum) seeds, the level of the chlorinated auxin, 4-chloroindole-3-acetic acid (4-Cl-IAA), greatly exceeds that of IAA. A key issue is how plants produce halogenated compounds such as 4-Cl-IAA. To better understand this topic, we investigated the distribution of the chlorinated auxin. We show for the first time, to our knowledge, that 4-Cl-IAA is found in the seeds of Medicago truncatula, Melilotus indicus, and three species of Trifolium. Furthermore, we found no evidence that Pinus spp. synthesize 4-Cl-IAA in seeds, contrary to a previous report. The evidence indicates a single evolutionary origin of 4-Cl-IAA synthesis in the Fabaceae, which may provide an ideal model system to further investigate the action and activity of halogenating enzymes in plants.

Indexed as

HalogenationChromatography, High Pressure LiquidFabaceaeFruitIndoleacetic AcidsPhylogenySeedsSpecies SpecificityTandem Mass Spectrometry4-chloroindole-3-acetic acidIndoleacetic Acids

Identifiers

PMID25971549
PMCPMC4741347
OpenAlexW2142164371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.