Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25971405›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2015

Key components of external facilitation in an acute stroke quality improvement collaborative in the Veterans Health Administration.

Balmatee Bidassie, Linda S Williams, Heather Woodward-Hagg, Marianne S Matthias, Teresa M Damush

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Balmatee BidassieVA Center for Applied Systems Engineering, VISN11 - Veterans Engineering Resource Center, Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN, USA. balmatee.bidassie@va.gov.
Linda S WilliamsHSR&D VA Stroke QUERI Center and VA Center for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Roudebush VAMC, Regenstrief Inc, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Linda.Williams6@va.gov.
Heather Woodward-HaggVA Center for Applied Systems Engineering, VISN11 - Veterans Engineering Resource Center, Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Heather.Woodward-Hagg@va.gov.
Marianne S MatthiasHSR&D VA Stroke QUERI Center and VA Center for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Roudebush VAMC, Regenstrief Inc, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Marianne.Matthias@va.gov.
Teresa M DamushHSR&D VA Stroke QUERI Center and VA Center for Health Information and Communication (CHIC), Roudebush VAMC, Regenstrief Inc, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Teresa.Damush@va.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFacilitation is a key component for successful implementation in several implementation frameworks; however, there is a paucity of research specifying this component. As part of a stroke quality improvement intervention in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), facilitation plus data feedback was compared to data feedback alone in 11 VA medical facilities. The objective of this study was to elucidate upon the facilitation components of the stroke quality improvement.

methodsWe conducted a secondary evaluation of external facilitation using semi-structured interviews. Five facilitators and two program directors were interviewed. Qualitative analysis was performed on transcribed interviews to gain an understanding of the role and activities of external facilitators during the on-site and telephone facilitation. Quantitative frequencies were calculated from the self-reported time spent in facilitation tasks by facilitators.

resultsThe external facilitators saw their role as empowering the clinical teams to take ownership of the process changes at the clinical sites to improve their performance quality. To fulfill this role, they reported engaging in a number of core tasks during telephone and on-site visits including: assessing the context in which the teams were currently operating, guiding the clinical teams through their planned changes and use of process improvement tools, identifying resources and making referrals, holding teams accountable for plan implementation with on-site visits, and providing support and encouragement to the teams. Time spent in facilitation activities changed across time from guiding change (early) to supporting efforts made by the clinical teams (later). Facilitation activity transitioned to more monitoring, problem solving, and intentional work to hand over the clinical improvement process to the site teams with the coach's role being increasingly that of a more distant consultant. Overall, this study demonstrated that external facilitation is not an event but rather a process where relationships and responsibilities evolve over time.

conclusionsThis study shows that external facilitation involves core elements related to communication, relationship building, methods training, monitoring performance over time, and facilitating team-based problem solving. Importantly, this work demonstrates the fluid nature of external facilitation over time, as teams learn, grow, change, and experience changing contexts.

Indexed as

Professional RoleCommunicationCooperative BehaviorHumansInterviews as TopicPatient Care TeamProcess Assessment, Health CareQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementStrokeTelephoneUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID25971405
PMCPMC4437451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.