Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25971367›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2015

[Burns and scalds in children].

B Landsleitner, J Keil

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B LandsleitnerAbteilung für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Cnopf´sche Kinderklinik/Klinik Hallerwiese, Diakonie Neuendettelsau, St.-Johannis-Mühlgasse 19, 90419, Nürnberg, Deutschland, bernd.landsleitner@diakonieneuendettelsau.de.
J Keil
Augustana-Hochschule Neuendettelsau · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince pediatric emergencies and burn injuries are rare in prehospital emergency medicine, emergency teams can hardly develop routine in emergency care.

objectivesHow to effectively treat burn injuries and avoid common errors? MATERIALS AND

methodsA simple and severity-based therapy concept based on the current literature using the example of a case report is presented.

resultsAbout 80% of burns and scalds in children are not severe cases-in these patients an effective analgesia by intranasal administration is important and further invasive treatments are generally not necessary. The emergency care of children with severe burn injuries should start with intranasally administered analgesia and/or sedation. After an intravenous or intraosseous access is gained, moderate fluid therapy is started, which should be complemented by a fluid bolus only if signs of a shock are present. Additional administration of analgesia and/or sedation may be necessary. Estimation of the burned body surface area is best determined with the palm rule; the severity of the burn appears after a latency period. Induction of anesthesia and intubation are not required in the majority of cases.

conclusionsBy applying a modified ABCDE scheme, all emergency teams can provide effective emergency care in children with burn injuries.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaBurnsBurn UnitsChildChild, PreschoolEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleFirst AidFluid TherapyGuideline AdherenceHospitals, PediatricHumansInfantMaleMedical ErrorsPatient Care Team

Identifiers

PMID25971367
OpenAlexW305967799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.