ReviewJournal of cardiovascular pharmacology2016
The Role of Pharmacogenetics in Atrial Fibrillation Therapeutics: Is Personalized Therapy in Sight?
Review in Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Usability of CHAFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Atrial Fibrillation Mechanisms and Implications for Catheter Ablation.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Review
- Investigational antiarrhythmic agents: promising drugs in early clinical development.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2017Review
- The value of basic research insights into atrial fibrillation mechanisms as a guide to therapeutic innovation: a critical analysis.Cardiovascular research · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia worldwide requiring therapy. Despite recent advances in catheter-based and surgical therapy, antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) remain the mainstay of treatment for symptomatic AF. However, response in individual patients is highly variable with over half the patients treated with rhythm control therapy experiencing recurrence of AF within a year. Contemporary AADs used to suppress AF are incompletely and unpredictably effective and associated with significant risks of proarrhythmia and noncardiac toxicities. Furthermore, this "one-size" fits all strategy for selecting antiarrhythmics is based largely on minimizing risk of adverse effects rather than on the likelihood of suppressing AF. The limited success of rhythm control therapy is in part due to heterogeneity of the underlying substrate, interindividual differences in disease mechanisms, and our inability to predict response to AADs in individual patients. Genetic studies of AF over the past decade have revealed that susceptibility to and response to therapy for AF is modulated by the underlying genetic substrate. However, the bedside application of these new discoveries to the management of AF patients has thus far been disappointing. This may in part be related to our limited understanding about genetic predictors of drug response in general, the challenges associated with determining efficacy of response to AADs, and lack of randomized genotype-directed clinical trials. Nonetheless, recent studies have shown that common AF susceptibility risk alleles at the chromosome 4q25 locus modulated response to AADs, electrical cardioversion, and ablation therapy. This monograph discusses how genetic approaches to AF have not only provided important insights into underlying mechanisms but also identified AF subtypes that can be better targeted with more mechanism-based "personalized" therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.