ArticleThe Journal of physiology2015
Short-latency crossed responses in the human biceps femoris muscle.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ipsi- and Contralateral Oligo- and Polysynaptic Reflexes in Humans Revealed by Low-Frequency Epidural Electrical Stimulation of the Lumbar Spinal Cord.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Rapid crossed responses in an intrinsic hand muscle during perturbed bimanual movements.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Article
- The mammalian spinal commissural system: properties and functions.Journal of neurophysiology · 2020Review
- Impact of Experimental Tonic Pain on Corrective Motor Responses to Mechanical Perturbations.Neural plasticity · 2020Article
- Interlimb Reflexes Induced by Electrical Stimulation of Cutaneous Nerves after Spinal Cord Injury.PloS one · 2016Article
- A Review on Locomotor Training after Spinal Cord Injury: Reorganization of Spinal Neuronal Circuits and Recovery of Motor Function.Neural plasticity · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
key pointsThe present study is the first to show short-latency crossed-spinal reflexes in the human upper leg muscles following mechanical rotations to the ipsilateral knee (iKnee) joint. The short-latency reflex in the contralateral biceps femoris (cBF) was inhibitory following iKnee extension perturbations, and facilitatory following iKnee flexion perturbations. The onset latency was 44 ms, indicating that purely spinal pathways mediate the cBF reflexes. The short-latency cBF inhibitory and facilitatory reflexes followed the automatic gain control principle, becoming larger as the level of background contraction in the cBF increased. The short-latency cBF reflexes were observed at the motor unit level using i.m. electromyography recordings, and the same population of cBF motor units that was inhibited following iKnee extensions was facilitated following iKnee flexions. Parallel interneuronal pathways from ipsilateral afferents to common motoneurons in the contralateral leg can therefore probably explain the perturbation direction-dependent reversal in the sign of the short-latency cBF reflex. ABSTRACT: Interlimb reflexes contribute to the central neural co-ordination between different limbs in both humans and animals. Although commissural interneurons have only been directly identified in animals, spinally-mediated interlimb reflexes have been discovered in a number of human lower limb muscles, indicating their existence in humans. The present study aimed to investigate whether short-latency crossed-spinal reflexes are present in the contralateral biceps femoris (cBF) muscle following ipsilateral knee (iKnee) joint rotations during a sitting task, where participants maintained a slight pre-contraction in the cBF. Following iKnee extension joint rotations, an inhibitory reflex was observed in the surface electromyographic (EMG) activity of the cBF, whereas a facilitatory reflex was observed in the cBF following iKnee flexion joint rotations. The onset latency of both cBF reflexes was 44 ms, which is too fast for a transcortical pathway to contribute. The cBF inhibitory and facilitatory reflexes followed the automatic gain control principle, with the size of the response increasing as the level of background pre-contraction in the cBF muscle increased. In addition to the surface EMG, both short-latency inhibitory and facilitatory cBF reflexes were recorded directly at the motor unit level by i.m. EMG, and the same population of cBF motor units that were inhibited following iKnee extension joint rotations were facilitated following iKnee flexion joint rotations. Therefore, parallel interneuronal pathways (probably involving commissural interneurons) from ipsilateral afferents to common motoneurons in the contralateral leg can probably explain the perturbation direction-dependent reversal in the sign of the short-latency cBF reflex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.