Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25970030›Full record

ArticleOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2015

Changes in Gene Expression and Hearing Thresholds After Cochlear Implantation.

Hongzheng Zhang, Gemaine Stark, Lina Reiss

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Relationships between Intrascalar Tissue, Neuron Survival, and Cochlear Implant Function.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hongzheng Zhang*Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; and †Oregon Hearing Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A.
Gemaine Stark
Lina Reiss
Southern Medical University · CN

Funding

PORTLAND AREA COMMUNICATION RESEARCH CORE CENTERP30DC005983 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI NUTTALL, ALFRED L · 2003 to 2017
$9.0M
Development of Translational Research to Improve Outcomes for Cochlear ImplantsP30DC010755 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FLINT, PAUL W · 2009 to 2010
$1.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005983NIDCD NIH HHS P30DC005983NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC010755NIDCD NIH HHS P30DC010755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

hypothesisGene expression changes occur in conjunction with hearing threshold changes after cochlear implantation.

backgroundBetween 30 and 50% of individuals who receive electro-acoustic stimulation (EAS) cochlear implants lose residual hearing after cochlear implantation, reducing the benefits of EAS. The mechanism underlying this hearing loss is unknown; potential pathways include mechanical damage, inflammation, or tissue remodeling changes.

methodsGuinea pigs were implanted in one ear with cochlear implant electrode arrays, with non-implanted ears serving as controls, and allowed to recover for 1, 3, 7, or 14 days. Hearing threshold changes were measured over time. Cochlear ribonucleic acid was analyzed using real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction from the following gene families: cytokines, tight junction claudins, ion and water (aquaporin) transport channels, gap junction connexins, and tissue remodeling genes.

resultsSignificant increases in expression were observed for cochlear inflammatory genes (Cxcl1, IL-1β, TNF-α, and Tnfrsf1a/b) and ion homeostasis genes (Scnn1γ, Aqp3, and Gjb3). Upregulation of tissue remodeling genes (TGF-β, MMP2, MMP9) as well as a paracrine gene (CTGF) was also observed. Hearing loss occurred rapidly, peaking at 3 days with some recovery at 7 and 14 days after implantation. MM9 exhibited extreme upregulation of expression and was qualitatively associated with changes in hearing thresholds.

conclusionCochlear implantation induces similar changes as middle ear inflammation for genes involved in inflammation and ion and water transport function, whereas tissue remodeling changes differ markedly. The upregulation of MMP9 with hearing loss is consistent with previous findings linking stria vascularis vessel changes with cochlear implant-induced hearing loss.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsAnimalsAuditory ThresholdCochlear ImplantationDisease Models, AnimalGuinea PigsHearing LossInflammationMatrix Metalloproteinase 9Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionTranscriptomeMatrix Metalloproteinase 9

Identifiers

PMID25970030
PMCPMC4884452
OpenAlexW283176880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.