Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25969991›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The effect of active learning methodologies on the teaching of pharmaceutical care in a Brazilian pharmacy faculty.

Alessandra R Mesquita, Werlissandra M Souza, Thays C Boaventura, Izadora M C Barros, Angelo R Antoniolli, Wellington B Silva, Divaldo P Lyra Júnior

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
25.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Active learning tools improve the learning outcomes, scientific attitude, and critical thinking in higher education: Experiences in an online course during the COVID-19 pandemic.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessandra R MesquitaDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristovão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Werlissandra M SouzaDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristovão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Thays C BoaventuraDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristovão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Izadora M C BarrosDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristovão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Angelo R AntoniolliDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristovão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Wellington B SilvaDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristovão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Divaldo P Lyra JúniorDepartment of Pharmacy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristovão, Sergipe, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Sergipe · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, pharmacists have been involved in expanded patient care responsibilities, for example patient counseling in self-medication, medication review and pharmaceutical care, which require graduates to develop the necessary competences. Consequently, reorientation of pharmacy education has become necessary. As such, active learning strategies have been introduced into classrooms to increase problem-solving and critical thinking skills of students. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance and perceptions of competency of students in a new pharmaceutical care course that uses active learning methodologies.

methodsThis pharmaceutical care course was conducted in the first semester of 2014, in the Federal University of Sergipe. In the pharmaceutical care course, active learning methods were used, consisting of dialogic classroom expository, simulation and case studies. Student learning was evaluated using classroom tests and instruments that evaluated the perception of competency in pharmaceutical care practice. Furthermore, students' satisfaction with the course was evaluated.

resultsThirty-three students completed the four evaluations used in the course (i.e., a discursive written exam, seminars, OSCE, and virtual patient); 25 were female (75.75%), and the median age was 23.43 (SD 2.82) years. The overall mean of student scores, in all evaluation methods was 7.97 (SD 0.59) on a scale of 0 to 10 points, and student performance on the virtual patient method was statistically superior to other methods. With respect to the perception of competency in pharmaceutical care practice, a comparison of pre- and post-test scores revealed statistically significant improvement for all evaluated competences. At the end of the semester, the students presented positive opinions of the pharmaceutical care course.

conclusionsThe results suggest that an active learning course can enhance the learning of pharmaceutical care competences. In future studies it will be necessary to compare active learning to traditional methods.

Indexed as

FacultyProblem-Based LearningAdultBrazilClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementEducation, PharmacyFemaleHumansMalePharmaceutical ServicesSurveys and QuestionnairesThinking

Identifiers

PMID25969991
PMCPMC4430170
OpenAlexW1542805537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.