ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine
The mental health care bill 2013: a critical appraisal.
Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Starting Solo: Experiences and Challenges of Early Career Psychiatrists in Private Practice in India.Cureus · 2025Article
- India's NITI Aayog's Health Index: Where Is the Mental Health?Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2022Article
- Ethical and Legal Issues in Psychotherapy.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2022Article
- Dealing with statutory bodies under the Mental Healthcare Act 2017.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2019Review
- How right is right-based mental health law?Indian journal of psychiatry · 2019Review
- Liabilities and penalties under Mental Healthcare Act 2017.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2019Review
- Is it the right time to implement Community Treatment Order in India?Indian journal of psychiatry · 2019Review
- Mental health, mental illness, and human rights in India and elsewhere: What are we aiming for?Indian journal of psychiatry · 2016Review
- How do Our Patients Respond to the Concept of Psychiatric Advance Directives? An Exploratory Study From India.Indian journal of psychological medicineArticle
- Being a Forensic Psychiatrist in India: Responsibilities, Difficulties, and Criticalities.Indian journal of psychological medicineReview
- A Focus Group Study of Indian Psychiatrists' Views on Electroconvulsive Therapy under India's Mental Healthcare Act 2017: 'The Ground Reality is Different'.Indian journal of psychological medicineArticle
- History of psychiatry: An Indian perspective.Industrial psychiatry journalReview
- Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, and addiction treatment: Potential pitfalls and trepidations.Indian journal of psychiatryArticle
- New legislation, new frontiers: Indian psychiatrists' perspective of the mental healthcare act 2017 prior to implementation.Indian journal of psychiatryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Mental Health Care Bill - 2013 has been introduced in Rajya Sabha and is now waiting for enactment. The Bill entails unprecedented measures to be undertaken by the Government ensuring everyone right to access mental health care and treatment from services run or funded by the Government. The Government is to meet the man-power requirement of mental health professionals according to international standard within a period of ten years. Various rights of persons with mental illness have been ensured. All the places where psychiatric patients are admitted and treated including the general hospital psychiatry units (GHPU) are to be registered as mental health establishments. Unmodified ECT has been banned and ECT to minors can be given only after approval from the Mental Health Review Board. This article advocates for exemption of GHPU from the purview of the Bill, taking into consideration impediment created in the treatment of vast majority of psychiatric patients who retain their insight into the illness and seldom require involuntary admissions. It is also advocated to reconsider ban on unmodified ECT and restriction placed on ECT to minor which are very effective treatment methods based on scientific evidence. In our country, family is an important asset in management of mental illness. But requirement of seeking approval from the Board in many of the mental health care decision may discourage the families to be proactive in taking care of their wards. The Board and Mental Health Authorities at the central and the state levels are authorized to take many crucial decisions, but these panels have very few experts in the field of mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.