Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25969394›Full record

ArticleBiochimica et biophysica acta2015

Equilibrium binding behavior of magnesium to wall teichoic acid.

Kieth J Thomas, Charles V Rice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sodium ion stress accelerates cell lysis inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. A Combined Probiotic-International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. ThemBio · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Structural Characterization of EnpA D,L-Endopeptidase fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kieth J ThomasDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Stephenson Life Sciences Research Center, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, OK 73019, USA.
Charles V RiceDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Stephenson Life Sciences Research Center, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Parkway, Norman, OK 73019, USA. Electronic address: rice@ou.edu.
University of Oklahoma · US

Funding

Metal Binding to the Bacterial Cell WallR01GM090064 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI RICE, CHARLES V · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM090064-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM090064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptidoglycan and teichoic acids are the major cell wall components of Gram-positive bacteria that obtain and sequester metal ions required for biochemical processes. The delivery of metals to the cytoplasmic membrane is aided by anionic binding sites within the peptidoglycan and along the phosphodiester polymer of teichoic acid. The interaction with metals is a delicate balance between the need for attraction and ion diffusion to the membrane. Likewise, metal chelation from the extracellular fluid must initially have strong binding energetics that weaken within the cell wall to enable ion release. We employed atomic absorption and equilibrium dialysis to measure the metal binding capacity and metal binding affinity of wall teichoic acid and Mg2+. Data show that Mg2+ binds to WTA with a 1:2Mg2+ to phosphate ratio with a binding capacity of 1.27 μmol/mg. The affinity of Mg2+ to WTA was also found to be 41×10(3) M(-1) at low metal concentrations and 1.3×10(3) M(-1) at higher Mg2+ concentrations due to weakening electrostatic effects. These values are lower than the values describing Mg2+ interactions with peptidoglycan. However, the binding capacity of WTA is 4 times larger than peptidoglycan. External WTA initially binds metals with positive cooperativity, but metal binding switches to negative cooperativity, whereas interior WTA binds metals with only negative cooperativity. The relevance of this work is to describe changes in metal binding behavior depending on environment. When metals are sparse, chelation is strong to ensure survival yet the binding weakens when essential minerals are abundant.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalBacillus subtilisBinding SitesCell MembraneEnergy TransferKineticsMagnesiumTeichoic AcidsMagnesiumTeichoic AcidsBindingHomeostasisMagnesiumPeptidoglycanTeichoic acid

Identifiers

PMID25969394
PMCPMC4554814
OpenAlexW2104819796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.