Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25968316›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2015

Neural retina identity is specified by lens-derived BMP signals.

Tanushree Pandit, Vijay K Jidigam, Cedric Patthey, Lena Gunhaga

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Involvement of a Basic Helix-Loop-Helix GeneJournal of developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. TheDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2020
    Article
  16. Dual roles of the retinal pigment epithelium and lens in cavefish eye degeneration.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Role ofInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tanushree PanditUmeå Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå 901 87, Sweden.
Vijay K JidigamUmeå Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå 901 87, Sweden.
Cedric PattheyUmeå Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå 901 87, Sweden.
Lena GunhagaUmeå Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå 901 87, Sweden lena.gunhaga@umu.se.
Umeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The eye has served as a classical model to study cell specification and tissue induction for over a century. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms that regulate the induction and maintenance of eye-field cells, and the specification of neural retina cells are poorly understood. Moreover, within the developing anterior forebrain, how prospective eye and telencephalic cells are differentially specified is not well defined. In the present study, we have analyzed these issues by manipulating signaling pathways in intact chick embryo and explant assays. Our results provide evidence that at blastula stages, BMP signals inhibit the acquisition of eye-field character, but from neural tube/optic vesicle stages, BMP signals from the lens are crucial for the maintenance of eye-field character, inhibition of dorsal telencephalic cell identity and specification of neural retina cells. Subsequently, our results provide evidence that a Rax2-positive eye-field state is not sufficient for the progress to a neural retina identity, but requires BMP signals. In addition, our results argue against any essential role of Wnt or FGF signals during the specification of neural retina cells, but provide evidence that Wnt signals together with BMP activity are sufficient to induce cells of retinal pigment epithelial character. We conclude that BMP activity emanating from the lens ectoderm maintains eye-field identity, inhibits telencephalic character and induces neural retina cells. Our findings link the requirement of the lens ectoderm for neural retina specification with the molecular mechanism by which cells in the forebrain become specified as neural retina by BMP activity.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone Morphogenetic ProteinsChick EmbryoEctodermLens, CrystallineRetinaBone Morphogenetic ProteinsBMPChickDevelopmentEyeLensNeural retina

Identifiers

PMID25968316
PMCPMC4440930
OpenAlexW1888262718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.