Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25968240›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of industrial medicine2015

Lead exposure in US worksites: A literature review and development of an occupational lead exposure database from the published literature.

Dong-Hee Koh, Sarah J Locke, Yu-Cheng Chen, Mark P Purdue, Melissa C Friesen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of industrial medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence provides a new option for measuring arsenic, mercury, and lead in dried blood spots.Journal of trace elements in medicine and biology : organ of the Society for Minerals and Trace Elements (GMS) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Underexplored terrain: effects of high priority environmental toxicants on skeletal muscle.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dong-Hee KohOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Sarah J LockeDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, International St.Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University, Incheon, Korea.
Yu-Cheng ChenOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Mark P PurdueOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Melissa C FriesenOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.

Funding

Occupational Exposure AssessmentZIACP010122 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI FRIESEN, MELISSA · 2009 to 2025
$8.6M
STUDIES OF OCCUPATIONAL CANCER--OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE ASSESSMENTZ01CP010122 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI DOSEMECI, MUSTAFA · 1996 to 2008
$83k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP010122Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetrospective exposure assessment of occupational lead exposure in population-based studies requires historical exposure information from many occupations and industries.

methodsWe reviewed published US exposure monitoring studies to identify lead measurement data. We developed an occupational lead exposure database from the 175 identified papers containing 1,111 sets of lead concentration summary statistics (21% area air, 47% personal air, 32% blood). We also extracted ancillary exposure-related information, including job, industry, task/location, year collected, sampling strategy, control measures in place, and sampling and analytical methods.

resultsThe measurements were published between 1940 and 2010 and represented 27 2-digit standardized industry classification codes. The majority of the measurements were related to lead-based paint work, joining or cutting metal using heat, primary and secondary metal manufacturing, and lead acid battery manufacturing.

conclusionsThis database can be used in future statistical analyses to characterize differences in lead exposure across time, jobs, and industries.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualHumansIndustryLeadOccupational ExposureOccupationsPaintRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesWorkplaceLeadexposure assessmentleadoccupational exposurepopulation-based studiesreview

Identifiers

PMID25968240
PMCPMC4711746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.