Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25968157›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2016

Role of verapamil in preventing and treating hypertrophic scars and keloids.

Ru Wang, Yu Mao, Zhenyu Zhang, Zhengyong Li, Junjie Chen, Ying Cen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Research advances on pharmacological interventions for hypertrophic scar].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Keloids: a review of therapeutic management.International journal of dermatology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ru WangDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yu MaoPediatric Department, The People's Hospital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
Zhenyu ZhangDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhengyong LiDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Junjie ChenDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ying CenDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CNFourth People's Hospital of Sichuan Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Keloid and hypertrophic scars are difficult to manage and remain a therapeutic challenge. Verapamil has shown a great potential in the management of keloid and hypertrophic scars. Comparing with conventional corticosteroid injections, verapamil could improve the appearance of keloid and hypertrophic scars, and is associated with a lower incidence of adverse effects. Is verapamil an effective alternative modality in the prevention and treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars? The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of verapamil in preventing and treating keloid and hypertrophic scars. Searches were conducted in Medline, EMbase and Cochrane databases from 1974 to January 2015. The selection of articles was limited to human subjects. Five randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or cluster-randomised trials or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing the efficacy of verapamil with conventional treatments were identified. The results showed that verapamil could improve keloid and hypertrophic scars, and was not significantly different from conventional corticosteroid injections. Few adverse effects were observed. However, this result should be considered carefully, as most of the included studies have a high risk of bias because of issues with randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcomes and selective reporting. In conclusion, verapamil could act as an effective alternative modality in the prevention and treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars. More high-quality, multiple-centre, large-sample (RCTs) are required to define the role of verapamil in preventing and treating keloid and hypertrophic scars.

Indexed as

Cicatrix, HypertrophicKeloidDatabases, FactualHumansVerapamilVerapamilHypertrophic scarMeta analysisTherapyVerapamil

Identifiers

PMID25968157
PMCPMC7949878
OpenAlexW1852793478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.