Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25968000›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Classification of accelerometer wear and non-wear events in seconds for monitoring free-living physical activity.

Shang-Ming Zhou, Rebecca A Hill, Kelly Morgan, Gareth Stratton, Mike B Gravenor, Gunnar Bijlsma, Sinead Brophy

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Physical activity measurements in individuals with interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shang-Ming ZhouCollege of Medicine, Swansea University, Wales, UK.
Rebecca A HillCollege of Medicine, Swansea University, Wales, UK.
Kelly MorganCollege of Medicine, Swansea University, Wales, UK.
Gareth StrattonCollege of Engineering, Swansea University, Wales, UK.
Mike B GravenorCollege of Medicine, Swansea University, Wales, UK.
Gunnar BijlsmaCollege of Medicine, Swansea University, Wales, UK.
Sinead BrophyCollege of Medicine, Swansea University, Wales, UK.

Funding

Department of Health MR/K006525/1Medical Research Council MR/K006525/1Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Medical Research Council MR/KO232331/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo classify wear and non-wear time of accelerometer data for accurately quantifying physical activity in public health or population level research.

designA bi-moving-window-based approach was used to combine acceleration and skin temperature data to identify wear and non-wear time events in triaxial accelerometer data that monitor physical activity.

settingLocal residents in Swansea, Wales, UK.

participants50 participants aged under 16 years (n=23) and over 17 years (n=27) were recruited in two phases: phase 1: design of the wear/non-wear algorithm (n=20) and phase 2: validation of the algorithm (n=30).

methodsParticipants wore a triaxial accelerometer (GeneActiv) against the skin surface on the wrist (adults) or ankle (children). Participants kept a diary to record the timings of wear and non-wear and were asked to ensure that events of wear/non-wear last for a minimum of 15 min.

resultsThe overall sensitivity of the proposed method was 0.94 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.98) and specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.94). It performed equally well for children compared with adults, and females compared with males. Using surface skin temperature data in combination with acceleration data significantly improved the classification of wear/non-wear time when compared with methods that used acceleration data only (p<0.01).

conclusionsUsing either accelerometer seismic information or temperature information alone is prone to considerable error. Combining both sources of data can give accurate estimates of non-wear periods thus giving better classification of sedentary behaviour. This method can be used in population studies of physical activity in free-living environments.

Indexed as

ExerciseSedentary BehaviorAccelerationAccelerometryAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsAnkleBody TemperatureChildFemaleHumansMaleMonitoring, AmbulatoryMotor ActivitySkinaccelerometerclassificationnon-wearphysical activityPUBLIC HEALTHsedentary behaviour

Identifiers

PMID25968000
PMCPMC4431141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.