ArticleBMC systems biology2015
Reshaping the epigenetic landscape during early flower development: induction of attractor transitions by relative differences in gene decay rates.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cellular patterns in Arabidopsis root epidermis emerge from gene regulatory network and diffusion dynamical feedback.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- A Boolean model explains phenotypic plasticity changes underlying hepatic cancer stem cells emergence.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Inferring gene regulatory networks using transcriptional profiles as dynamical attractors.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Uncoding the interdependency of tumor microenvironment and macrophage polarization: insights from a continuous network approach.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Identification of dynamic driver sets controlling phenotypical landscapes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- The flowering transition pathways converge into a complex gene regulatory network that underlies the phase changes of the shoot apical meristem inFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Using linkage logic theory to control dynamics of a gene regulatory network of a chordate embryo.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A system-level mechanistic explanation for asymmetric stem cell fates: Arabidopsis thaliana root niche as a study system.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Role of Cytokine Combinations on CD4+ T Cell Differentiation, Partial Polarization, and Plasticity: Continuous Network Modeling Approach.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- The CD4+ T cell regulatory network mediates inflammatory responses during acute hyperinsulinemia: a simulation study.BMC systems biology · 2017Article
- NetLand: quantitative modeling and visualization of Waddington's epigenetic landscape using probabilistic potential.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- Gene regulatory network underlying the immortalization of epithelial cells.BMC systems biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGene regulatory network (GRN) dynamical models are standard systems biology tools for the mechanistic understanding of developmental processes and are enabling the formalization of the epigenetic landscape (EL) model.
methodsIn this work we propose a modeling framework which integrates standard mathematical analyses to extend the simple GRN Boolean model in order to address questions regarding the impact of gene specific perturbations in cell-fate decisions during development.
resultsWe systematically tested the propensity of individual genes to produce qualitative changes to the EL induced by modification of gene characteristic decay rates reflecting the temporal dynamics of differentiation stimuli. By applying this approach to the flower specification GRN (FOS-GRN) we uncovered differences in the functional (dynamical) role of their genes. The observed dynamical behavior correlates with biological observables. We found a relationship between the propensity of undergoing attractor transitions between attraction basins in the EL and the direction of differentiation during early flower development - being less likely to induce up-stream attractor transitions as the course of development progresses. Our model also uncovered a potential mechanism at play during the transition from EL basins defining inflorescence meristem to those associated to flower organs meristem. Additionally, our analysis provided a mechanistic interpretation of the homeotic property of the ABC genes, being more likely to produce both an induced inter-attractor transition and to specify a novel attractor. Finally, we found that there is a close relationship between a gene's topological features and its propensity to produce attractor transitions.
conclusionsThe study of how the state-space associated with a dynamical model of a GRN can be restructured by modulation of genes' characteristic expression times is an important aid for understanding underlying mechanisms occurring during development. Our contribution offers a simple framework to approach such problem, as exemplified here by the case of flower development. Different GRN models and the effect of diverse inductive signals can be explored within the same framework. We speculate that the dynamical role of specific genes within a GRN, as uncovered here, might give information about which genes are more likely to link a module to other regulatory circuits and signaling transduction pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.