Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25967757›Full record

ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2016

The Effect of Lesion Size on the Organization of the Ipsilesional and Contralesional Motor Cortex.

Boris Touvykine, Babak K Mansoori, Loyda Jean-Charles, Joan Deffeyes, Stephan Quessy, Numa Dancause

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. [Research advances in nerve transfer for upper limb function restoration: applications from peripheral nerve injury to central nervous system injury].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Boris TouvykineDépartement de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Babak K MansooriDépartement de Biologie moléculaire, Biochimie médicale et pathologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Loyda Jean-CharlesDépartement de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Joan DeffeyesDépartement de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Stephan QuessyDépartement de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Numa DancauseDépartement de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada Groupe de Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Central (GRSNC), Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada numa.dancause@umontreal.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recovery of hand function following lesions in the primary motor cortex (M1) is associated with a reorganization of premotor areas in the ipsilesional hemisphere, and this reorganization depends on the size of the lesion. It is not clear how lesion size affects motor representations in the contralesional hemisphere and how the effects in the 2 hemispheres compare. Our goal was to study how lesion size affects motor representations in the ipsilesional and contralesional hemispheres. In rats, we induced lesions of different sizes in the caudal forelimb area (CFA), the equivalent of M1. The effective lesion volume in each animal was quantified histologically. Behavioral recovery was evaluated with the Montoya Staircase task for 28 days after the lesion. Then, the organization of the CFA and the rostral forelimb area (RFA)--the putative premotor area in rats--in the 2 cerebral hemispheres was studied with intracortical microstimulation mapping techniques. The distal forelimb representation in the RFA of both the ipsilesional and contralesional hemispheres was positively correlated with the size of the lesion. In contrast, lesion size had no effect on the contralesional CFA, and there was no relationship between movement representations in the 2 hemispheres. Finally, only the contralesional RFA was negatively correlated with chronic motor deficits of the paretic forelimb. Our data show that lesion size has comparable effects on motor representations in premotor areas of both hemispheres and suggest that the contralesional premotor cortex may play a greater role in the recovery of the paretic forelimb following large lesions.

Indexed as

Functional LateralityAnimalsBrain IschemiaBrain MappingChronic DiseaseDisease Models, AnimalEndothelin-1ForelimbMotor ActivityMotor CortexMovement DisordersNeural PathwaysNeuronal PlasticityRandom AllocationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyEndothelin-1contralesionalcortexhandintact hemisphereipsilesionallesion sizemotor representationsplasticityrecoverystroke

Identifiers

PMID25967757
PMCPMC4766967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.