Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25967670›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2015

A longitudinal survey of African swine fever in Uganda reveals high apparent disease incidence rates in domestic pigs, but absence of detectable persistent virus infections in blood and serum.

Denis Muhangi, Charles Masembe, Ulf Emanuelson, Sofia Boqvist, Lawrence Mayega, Rose Okurut Ademun, Richard P Bishop, Michael Ocaido, Mikael Berg, Karl Ståhl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Denis MuhangiDepartment of Wildlife and Aquatic Resources, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda. mdenis@covab.mak.ac.ug.
Charles MasembeDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda. cmasembe@cns.mak.ac.ug.
Ulf EmanuelsonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P. O. Box 7054, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden. ulf.emanuelson@slu.se.
Sofia BoqvistDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P. O. Box 7028, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden. sofia.boqvist@slu.se.
Lawrence MayegaDistrict Veterinary Office, under the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries, Masaka, Uganda. mayeganyombi@yahoo.com.
Rose Okurut AdemunMinistry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries, P. O. Box 102, Entebbe, Uganda. ademunrose@yahoo.co.uk.
Richard P BishopInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), P.O. Box 30709, GPO 00100, Nairobi, Kenya. r.bishop@cgiar.org.
Michael OcaidoDepartment of Wildlife and Aquatic Resources, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda. mocaido@yahoo.com.
Mikael BergDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P. O. Box 7028, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden. mikael.berg@slu.se.
Karl StåhlDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P. O. Box 7028, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden. karl.stahl@slu.se.
Makerere University · UGSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEMinistry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries · UGInternational Livestock Research Institute · KESwedish Veterinary Agency · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfrican swine fever (ASF) is a fatal, haemorrhagic disease of domestic pigs, that poses a serious threat to pig farmers and is currently endemic in domestic pigs in most of sub-Saharan Africa. To obtain insight into the factors related to ASF outbreaks at the farm-level, a longitudinal study was performed in one of the major pig producing areas in central Uganda. Potential risk factors associated with outbreaks of ASF were investigated including the possible presence of apparently healthy ASF-virus (ASFV) infected pigs, which could act as long-term carriers of the virus. Blood and serum were sampled from 715 pigs (241 farms) and 649 pigs (233 farms) to investigate presence of ASFV and antibodies, during the periods of June-October 2010 and March-June 2011, respectively. To determine the potential contribution of different risks to ASF spread, a questionnaire-based survey was administered to farmers to assess the association between ASF outbreaks during the study period and the risk factors.

resultsFifty-one (21 %) and 13 (5.6 %) farms reported an ASF outbreak on their farms in the previous one to two years and during the study period, respectively. The incidence rate for ASF prior to the study period was estimated at 14.1 per 100 pig farm-years and 5.6 per 100 pig farm-years during the study. Three pigs tested positive for ASFV using real-time PCR, but none tested positive for ASFV specific antibodies using two different commercial ELISA tests.

conclusionsThere was no evidence for existence of pigs that were long-term carriers for the virus based on the analysis of blood and serum as there were no seropositive pigs and the only three ASFV DNA positive pigs were acutely infected and were linked to outbreaks reported by farmers during the study. Potential ASF risk factors were present on both small and medium-scale pig farms, although small scale farms exhibited a higher proportion with multiple potential risk factors (like borrowing boars for sows mating, buying replacement from neighboring farms without ascertaining health status, etc) and did not implement any biosecurity measures. However, no risk factors were significantly associated with ASF reports during the study.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAnimalsAntibodies, ViralDisease OutbreaksDNA, ViralLongitudinal StudiesRisk FactorsSwineUgandaAntibodies, ViralDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID25967670
PMCPMC4432512
OpenAlexW1583068675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.