ArticleJIMD reports2015
High Incidence of Biotinidase Deficiency from a Pilot Newborn Screening Study in Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Article in JIMD reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laboratory diagnosis of biotinidase deficiency, 2017 update: a technical standard and guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017Guideline
- Article
- High Incidence of Partial Biotinidase Deficiency in the First 3 Years of a Regional Newborn Screening Program in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Partial Biotinidase Deficiency Revealed Imbalances in Acylcarnitines Profile at Tandem Mass Spectrometry Newborn Screening.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Biotinidase deficiency: Genotype-biochemical phenotype association in Brazilian patients.PloS one · 2017Article
- Clinical utility gene card for: Biotinidase deficiency-update 2015.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the incidence of biotinidase deficiency among newborns and their clinical outcome up to one year of age in a large pilot screening study in Minas Gerais, Brazil.
methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted from September 2007 to June 2008 with heel-prick blood samples collected on filter paper for the purpose of newborn screening. A qualitative colorimetric test was used as the primary screening method. Colorimetric-positive cases were further tested with a serum confirmatory assay. Gene sequencing was performed for eight children suspected with biotinidase deficiency and for some of their parents. Positive cases were daily supplemented with oral biotin and were followed up for approximately six years.
resultsOut of 182,891 newborns screened, 129 were suspected of having biotinidase deficiency. Partial deficiency was confirmed in seven children (one was homozygous for p.D543E) and profound deficiency in one child (homozygous p.H485Q). Thus the incidence was one in 22,861 live births (95% confidence interval 1:13,503 to 1:74,454) for profound and partial biotinidase deficiency combined. Two novel mutations were detected: p.A281V and p.E177K. In silico analysis and estimation of the enzyme activity in the children and their parents showed that p.A281V is pathogenic and p.E177K behaves like p.D444H.
conclusionThe incidence of biotinidase deficiency in newborn screening in Minas Gerais was higher than several international studies. The sample size should be larger for final conclusions. Oral daily biotin apparently precluded clinical symptoms, but it may have been unnecessary in some newborns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.