Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25966981›Full record

ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2015

Dark Agouti rat model of chemotherapy-induced mucositis: establishment and current state of the art.

Barbara Vanhoecke, Emma Bateman, Bronwen Mayo, Eline Vanlancker, Andrea Stringer, Daniel Thorpe, Dorothy Keefe

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Effect ofExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effect ofClinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara VanhoeckeMucositis Research Group, Centre for Personalised Cancer Medicine (CPCM), Centre for Clinical Research Excellence (CCRE) in Oral Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005 South Australia, Australia Laboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology, University of Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Emma BatemanMucositis Research Group, Centre for Personalised Cancer Medicine (CPCM), Centre for Clinical Research Excellence (CCRE) in Oral Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005 South Australia, Australia.
Bronwen MayoMucositis Research Group, Centre for Personalised Cancer Medicine (CPCM), Centre for Clinical Research Excellence (CCRE) in Oral Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005 South Australia, Australia Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5001 South Australia, Australia.
Eline VanlanckerLaboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology, University of Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Andrea StringerSansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5001 South Australia, Australia andrea.stringer@unisa.edu.au.
Daniel ThorpeSansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5001 South Australia, Australia.
Dorothy KeefeMucositis Research Group, Centre for Personalised Cancer Medicine (CPCM), Centre for Clinical Research Excellence (CCRE) in Oral Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, 5005 South Australia, Australia Director, SA Cancer Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, 5005 South Australia, Australia.
Centre for Cancer Biology · AUUniversity of South Australia · AUGhent University · BERoyal Adelaide Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucositis is a major oncological problem. The entire gastrointestinal and genitourinary tract and also other mucosal surfaces can be affected in recipients of radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy. Major progress has been made in recent years in understanding the mechanisms of oral and small intestinal mucositis, which appears to be more prominent than colonic damage. This progress is largely due to the development of representative laboratory animal models of mucositis. This review focuses on the development and establishment of the Dark Agouti rat mammary adenocarcinoma model by the Mucositis Research Group of the University of Adelaide over the past 20 years to characterize the mechanisms underlying methotrexate-, 5-fluorouracil-, and irinotecan-induced mucositis. It also aims to summarize the results from studies using different animal model systems to identify new molecular and cellular markers of mucositis.

Indexed as

MucositisAdenocarcinomaAnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinFemaleFluorouracilHumansIrinotecanMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMethotrexateMiceRatsCamptothecinFluorouracilIrinotecanMethotrexate5-fluorouracilchemotherapyirinotecanmethotrexatemucositisRat

Identifiers

PMID25966981
PMCPMC4935219
OpenAlexW1873953705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.