Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25966847›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Coffee and its waste repel gravid Aedes albopictus females and inhibit the development of their embryos.

Tomomitsu Satho, Hamady Dieng, Muhammad Hishamuddin Itam Ahmad, Salbiah Binti Ellias, Ahmad Abu Hassan, Fatimah Abang, Idris Abd Ghani, Fumio Miake, Hamdan Ahmad, Yuki Fukumitsu and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Coffee waste, vector control, and dengue.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Mosquito oviposition deterrents.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Tomomitsu SathoFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan. satho@fukuoka-u.ac.jp.
Hamady DiengInstitute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Malaysia. hamachan1@yahoo.com.
Muhammad Hishamuddin Itam AhmadSchool of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. hishamuddin@gmail.com.
Salbiah Binti ElliasSchool of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. salbiahellias@gmail.com.
Ahmad Abu HassanSchool of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. stegoculex@gmail.com.
Fatimah AbangFaculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kuching, Malaysia. fatim@frst.unimas.my.
Idris Abd GhaniFaculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, 43600, Selangor, Malaysia. idrisyatie@yahoo.com.my.
Fumio MiakeFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan. fmiake@fukuoka-u.ac.jp.
Hamdan AhmadSchool of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. hamdana@usm.my.
Yuki FukumitsuFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan. yuki.fukumitsu@gmail.com.
Wan Fatma ZuharahSchool of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. wanfatma@gmail.com.
Abdul Hafiz Ab MajidSchool of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. abdhafiz@usm.my.
Nur Faeza Abu KassimSchool of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. aija81@msn.com.
Nur Aida HashimSchool of Food Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia. nuraida203@yahoo.com.
Olaide Olawunmi AjibolaFaculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kuching, Malaysia. olaideajibola@gmail.com.
Fatima Abdulla Al-KhayyatDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. falqhayyat@qu.edu.qa.
Cirilo Nolasco-HipolitoFaculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kuching, Malaysia. hcnolasco@frst.unimas.my.
Universiti Sains Malaysia · MYUniversiti Malaysia Sarawak · MYFukuoka University · JPNational University of Malaysia · MYQatar University · QAUniversiti Malaysia Terengganu · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue is a prevalent arboviral disease and the development of insecticide resistance among its vectors impedes endeavors to control it. Coffee is drunk by millions of people daily worldwide, which is associated with the discarding of large amounts of waste. Coffee and its waste contain large amounts of chemicals many of which are highly toxic and none of which have a history of resistance in mosquitoes. Once in solution, coffee is brownish in colour, resembling leaf infusion, which is highly attractive to gravid mosquitoes. To anticipate the environmental issues related to the increasing popularity of coffee as a drink, and also to combat insecticide resistance, we explored the deterrence potentials of coffee leachates against the ovipositing and embryonic stages of the dengue vector, Aedes albopictus.

methodsIn a series of choice, no-choice, and embryo toxicity bioassays, we examined changes in the ovipositional behaviours and larval eclosion of Ae. albopictus in response to coffee extracts at different concentrations.

resultsOviposition responses were extremely low when ovicups holding highly concentrated extract (HCE) of coffee were the only oviposition sites. Gravid females retained increased numbers of mature eggs until 5 days post-blood feeding. When provided an opportunity to oviposit in cups containing coffee extracts and with water, egg deposition occurred at lower rates in those containing coffee, and HCE cups were far less attractive to females than those containing water only. Females that successfully developed in a coffee environment preferentially oviposited in such cups when in competition with preferred oviposition sites (water cups), but this trait did not continue into the fourth generation. Larval eclosion occurred at lower rates among eggs that matured in a coffee environment, especially among those that were maintained on HCE-moistened substrates.

conclusionsThe observations of the present study indicate a pronounced vulnerability of Ae. albopictus to the presence of coffee in its habitats during the early phases of its life cycle. The observations that coffee repels gravid females and inhibits larval eclosion provide novel possibilities in the search for novel oviposition deterrents and anti-larval eclosion agents against dengue vectors.

Indexed as

CoffeeAedesAnimalsBiological AssayDengueFemaleInsecticide ResistanceInsect VectorsLarvaOvipositionReproductionCoffee

Identifiers

PMID25966847
PMCPMC4436121
OpenAlexW1558935478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.