Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25966634›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2016

Improving preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Fragile X syndrome: two new powerful single-round multiplex indirect and direct tests.

Emmanuelle Kieffer, Jean-Christophe Nicod, Nathalie Gardes, Claire Kastner, Nicolas Becker, Catherine Celebi, Olivier Pirrello, Catherine Rongières, Isabelle Koscinski, Philippe Gosset and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emmanuelle KiefferLaboratoire de Diagnostic Préimplantatoire, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, site du CMCO, Strasbourg, France.
Jean-Christophe NicodLaboratoire de Diagnostic Préimplantatoire, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, site du CMCO, Strasbourg, France.
Nathalie GardesLaboratoire de Diagnostic Préimplantatoire, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, site du CMCO, Strasbourg, France.
Claire KastnerLaboratoire de Diagnostic Préimplantatoire, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, site du CMCO, Strasbourg, France.
Nicolas BeckerLaboratoire de Biologie de la Reproduction, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, site du CMCO, Strasbourg, France.
Catherine CelebiLaboratoire de Biologie de la Reproduction, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, site du CMCO, Strasbourg, France.
Olivier PirrelloAssistance Médicale à la Procréation, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, site du CMCO, Strasbourg, France.
Catherine RongièresAssistance Médicale à la Procréation, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, site du CMCO, Strasbourg, France.
Isabelle KoscinskiLaboratoire de Biologie de la Reproduction, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, site du CMCO, Strasbourg, France.
Philippe GossetLaboratoire de Diagnostic Préimplantatoire, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, site du CMCO, Strasbourg, France.
Céline MoutouLaboratoire de Diagnostic Préimplantatoire, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, site du CMCO, Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FraX) is caused by the expansion of an unstable CGG repeat located in the Fragile X mental retardation 1 gene (FMR1) gene. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) can be proposed to couples at risk of transmitting the disease, that is, when the female carries a premutation or a full mutation. We describe two new single-cell, single-round multiplex PCR for indirect and direct diagnosis of FraX on biopsied embryos. These tests include five unpublished, highly heterozygous simple sequence repeats, and the co-amplification of non-expanded CGG repeats for the direct test. Heterozygosity of the new markers ranged from 69 to 81%. The mean rate of non-informative marker included in the tests was low (26% and 23% for the new indirect and direct tests, respectively). This strategy allows offering a PGD for FraX to 96% of couples requesting it in our centre. A conclusive genotype was obtained in all cells with a rate of cells presenting an allele dropout ranging from 17% for the indirect test to 26% for the direct test. The new indirect test was applied for eight PGD cycles: 32 embryos were analysed, 9 were transferred and 3 healthy babies were born. By multiplexing these highly informative markers, robustness of the diagnosis is improved and the loss of potentially healthy embryos (because they are non-diagnosed or misdiagnosed) is limited. This may increase the chances of success of couples requesting a PGD for FraX, in particular, when premature ovarian insufficiency in premutated women leads to a reduced number of embryos available for analysis.

Indexed as

Preimplantation DiagnosisAdultAllelesFemaleFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Fragile X SyndromeGenotypeHeterozygoteHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionMutationPregnancyPrimary Ovarian InsufficiencySingle-Cell AnalysisTrinucleotide RepeatsFMR1 protein, humanFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1

Identifiers

PMID25966634
PMCPMC4717215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.