Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25966284›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Comparative hazard identification by a single dose lung exposure of zinc oxide and silver nanomaterials in mice.

Ilse Gosens, Ali Kermanizadeh, Nicklas Raun Jacobsen, Anke-Gabriele Lenz, Bas Bokkers, Wim H de Jong, Petra Krystek, Lang Tran, Vicki Stone, Håkan Wallin and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Ilse GosensCentre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Ali KermanizadehHeriot-Watt University, School of Life Sciences, Nanosafety Research Group, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Nicklas Raun JacobsenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anke-Gabriele LenzGerman Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Institute of Lung Biology and Disease, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Bas BokkersCentre for Safety of Substances and Products, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Wim H de JongCentre for Health Protection, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Petra KrystekPhilips Innovation Services, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Lang TranIOM, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Vicki StoneHeriot-Watt University, School of Life Sciences, Nanosafety Research Group, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Håkan WallinNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Public Health, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tobias StoegerGerman Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Institute of Lung Biology and Disease, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Flemming R CasseeCentre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands; Institute for Risk Assessment Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEHeriot-Watt University · GBNational Research Centre for the Working Environment · DKInstitute of Occupational Medicine · GBPhilips (Netherlands) · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative hazard identification of nanomaterials (NMs) can aid in the prioritisation for further toxicity testing. Here, we assessed the acute lung, systemic and liver responses in C57BL/6N mice for three NMs to provide a hazard ranking. A silver (Ag), non-functionalised zinc oxide (ZnO) and a triethoxycaprylylsilane functionalised ZnO NM suspended in water with 2% mouse serum were examined 24 hours following a single intratracheal instillation (I.T.). An acute pulmonary inflammation was noted (marked by a polymorphonuclear neutrophil influx) with cell damage (LDH and total protein) in broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) after administration of both non-functionalised and functionalised ZnO. The latter also induced systemic inflammation measured as an increase in blood neutrophils and a decrease in blood lymphocytes. Exposure to Ag NM was not accompanied by pulmonary inflammation or cytotoxicity, or by systemic inflammation. A decrease in glutathione levels was demonstrated in the liver following exposure to high doses of all three nanomaterials irrespective of any noticeable inflammatory or cytotoxic effects in the lung. By applying benchmark dose (BMD) modeling statistics to compare potencies of the NMs, we rank functionalised ZnO ranked the highest based on the largest number of affected endpoints, as well as the strongest responses observed after 24 hours. The non-functionalised ZnO NM gave an almost similar response, whereas Ag NM did not cause an acute response at similar doses.

Indexed as

AnimalsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidInjections, SpinalInstillation, DrugLungMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNanostructuresSilverToxicity TestsZinc OxideSilverZinc Oxide

Identifiers

PMID25966284
PMCPMC4429007
OpenAlexW1542568448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.