Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25966025›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Clinical and histopathological features of patients with systemic sclerosis undergoing endomyocardial biopsy.

Karin A L Mueller, Iris I Mueller, David Eppler, Christine S Zuern, Peter Seizer, Ulrich Kramer, Ina Koetter, Martin Roecken, Reinhard Kandolf, Meinrad Gawaz and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Karin A L MuellerMedizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Eberhard Karls Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Iris I MuellerMedizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Eberhard Karls Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
David EpplerMedizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Eberhard Karls Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Christine S ZuernMedizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Eberhard Karls Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Peter SeizerMedizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Eberhard Karls Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Ulrich KramerInstitut für Radiologie, Eberhard Karls Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Ina KoetterCentre for Interdisciplinary Clinical Immunology, Rheumatology and Autoimmune Diseases - INDRA and Department of Internal Medicine II (Oncology, Haematology, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pulmonology), Eberhard Karls University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany.
Martin RoeckenHautklinik, Eberhard Karls Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Reinhard KandolfAbteilung für Molekulare Pathologie, Eberhard Karls Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Meinrad GawazMedizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Eberhard Karls Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Tobias GeislerMedizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Eberhard Karls Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Joerg C HenesCentre for Interdisciplinary Clinical Immunology, Rheumatology and Autoimmune Diseases - INDRA and Department of Internal Medicine II (Oncology, Haematology, Immunology, Rheumatology, Pulmonology), Eberhard Karls University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany.
Karin KlingelAbteilung für Molekulare Pathologie, Eberhard Karls Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is associated with a variable phenotype including heart failure, arrhythmias and pulmonary hypertension. The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical characteristics, histopathological findings and outcome of patients with SSc and a clinical phenotype suggesting cardiac involvement. METHODS AND

results25 patients with SSc and clinical signs of cardiac involvement were included between June 2007 and December 2010. They underwent routine clinical work-up including laboratory testing, echocardiography, left and right heart catheterization, holter recordings and endomyocardial biopsy. Primary endpoint (EP) was defined as the combination of cardiovascular death, arrhythmic endpoints (defined as appropriate discharge of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)) or rehospitalization due to heart failure. The majority of patients presented with slightly impaired left ventricular function (mean LVEF 54.1±9.0%, determined by echocardiography). Endomyocardial biopsies detected cardiac fibrosis in all patients with a variable area percentage of 8% to 32%. Cardiac inflammation was diagnosed as follows: No inflammation in 3.8%, isolated inflammatory cells in 38.5%, a few foci of inflammation in 30.8%, several foci of inflammation in 15.4%, and pronounced inflammation in 7.7% of patients. During follow up (FU) (22.5 months), seven (28%) patients reached the primary EP. Patients with subsequent events showed a higher degree of fibrosis and inflammation in the myocardium by trend. While patients with an inflammation grade 0 or 1 showed an event rate of 18.2%, the subgroup of patients with an inflammation grade 2 presented with an event rate of 25% versus an event rate of 50% in the subgroup of patients with an inflammation grade 3 and 4, respectively (p=0.193). Furthermore, the subgroup of patients with fibrosis grade 1 showed an event rate of 11%, patients with fibrosis grade 2 and 3 presented with an event rate of 33% and 42% respectively (p = 0.160).

conclusionsPatients with SSc and clinical signs of cardiac involvement presented with mildly impaired LVEF. Prognosis was poor with an event rate of 28% within 22.5 months FU and was associated with the degree of cardiac inflammation and fibrosis.

Indexed as

AdultBiopsyDeathDefibrillators, ImplantableEchocardiographyFemaleFibrosisHeartHeart FailureHeart VentriclesHumansInflammationMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumScleroderma, Systemic

Identifiers

PMID25966025
PMCPMC4428754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.