Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25966007›Full record

ArticleBioanalysis2015

Optimizing artificial neural network models for metabolomics and systems biology: an example using HPLC retention index data.

L Mark Hall, Dennis W Hill, Lochana C Menikarachchi, Ming-Hui Chen, Lowell H Hall, David F Grant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioanalysis, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The application of artificial neural networks in metabolomics: a historical perspective.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2019
    Review
  8. Challenges in Identifying the Dark Molecules of Life.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

L Mark HallHall Associates Consulting, Quincy, MA, USA.
Dennis W Hill
Lochana C Menikarachchi
Ming-Hui Chen
Lowell H Hall
David F Grant

Funding

Metabolomics Tools for BiomedicineR01GM087714 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI GRANT, DAVID FRANKLIN · 2010 to 2018
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM087714NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial Neural Networks (ANN) are extensively used to model 'omics' data. Different modeling methodologies and combinations of adjustable parameters influence model performance and complicate model optimization. METHODOLOGY: We evaluated optimization of four ANN modeling parameters (learning rate annealing, stopping criteria, data split method, network architecture) using retention index (RI) data for 390 compounds. Models were assessed by independent validation (I-Val) using newly measured RI values for 1492 compounds.

conclusionThe best model demonstrated an I-Val standard error of 55 RI units and was built using a Ward's clustering data split and a minimally nonlinear network architecture. Use of validation statistics for stopping and final model selection resulted in better independent validation performance than the use of test set statistics.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial IntelligenceChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCluster AnalysisDatabases, FactualSystems BiologyTandem Mass Spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID25966007
PMCPMC4462168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.