Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25965438›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2015

Postoperative resource utilization and survival among liver transplant recipients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease score ≥ 40: A retrospective cohort study.

Filipe S Cardoso, Constantine J Karvellas, Norman M Kneteman, Glenda Meeberg, Pedro Fidalgo, Sean M Bagshaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Referral to Liver Transplant: A National Survey from Portugal.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  2. The effects of prognostic factors on transplant and mortality of patients with end-stage liver disease using Markov multistate model.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Approaches for patients with very high MELD scores.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2019
    Review
  4. [Frontiers in liver transplantation in indication and techniques].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Filipe S Cardoso
Constantine J Karvellas
Norman M Kneteman
Glenda Meeberg
Pedro Fidalgo
Sean M Bagshaw

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirrhotic patients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score ≥ 40 have high risk for death without liver transplant (LT).

objectiveTo evaluate these patients' outcomes after LT.

methodsThe present study analyzed a retrospective cohort of 519 cirrhotic adult patients who underwent LT at a single Canadian centre between 2002 and 2012. Primary exposure was severity of liver disease measured by MELD score at LT (≥ 40 versus < 40). Primary outcome was duration of first intensive care unit (ICU) stay after LT. Secondary outcomes were duration of first hospital stay after LT, rate of ICU readmission, re-LT and survival rates.

resultsOn the day of LT, 5% (28 of 519) of patients had a MELD score ≥ 40. These patients had longer first ICU stays after LT (14 versus two days; P < 0.001). MELD score ≥ 40 at LT was independently associated with first ICU stay after LT ≥ 10 days (OR 3.21). These patients had longer first hospital stays after LT (45 versus 18 days; P < 0.001); however, there was no significant difference in the rate of ICU readmission (18% versus 22%; P = 0.58) or re-LT rate (4% versus 4%; P = 1.00). Cumulative survival at one month, three months, one year, three years and five years was 98%, 96%, 90%, 79% and 72%, respectively. There was no significant difference in cumulative survival stratified according to MELD score ≥ 40 versus < 40 at LT (P = 0.59).

conclusionsCirrhotic patients with MELD score ≥ 40 at LT utilize greater postoperative health resources; however, they derive similar long-term survival benefit from LT.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdultAgedCanadaEnd Stage Liver DiseaseFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayLiver CirrhosisLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPostoperative PeriodReoperation

Identifiers

PMID25965438
PMCPMC4444027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.