Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25965420›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Design and construction of an inexpensive homemade plant growth chamber.

Fumiaki Katagiri, Dario Canelon-Suarez, Kelsey Griffin, John Petersen, Rachel K Meyer, Megan Siegle, Keisuke Mase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fumiaki KatagiriDepartment of Plant Biology, Microbial and Plant Genomics Institute, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Dario Canelon-SuarezDepartment of Plant Biology, Microbial and Plant Genomics Institute, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Kelsey GriffinDepartment of Plant Biology, Microbial and Plant Genomics Institute, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
John PetersenDepartment of Plant Biology, Microbial and Plant Genomics Institute, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Rachel K MeyerDepartment of Plant Biology, Microbial and Plant Genomics Institute, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Megan SiegleDepartment of Plant Biology, Microbial and Plant Genomics Institute, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Keisuke MaseDepartment of Plant Biology, Microbial and Plant Genomics Institute, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant growth chambers produce controlled environments, which are crucial in making reproducible observations in experimental plant biology research. Commercial plant growth chambers can provide precise controls of environmental parameters, such as temperature, humidity, and light cycle, and the capability via complex programming to regulate these environmental parameters. But they are expensive. The high cost of maintaining a controlled growth environment is often a limiting factor when determining experiment size and feasibility. To overcome the limitation of commercial growth chambers, we designed and constructed an inexpensive plant growth chamber with consumer products for a material cost of $2,300. For a comparable growth space, a commercial plant growth chamber could cost $40,000 or more. Our plant growth chamber had outside dimensions of 1.5 m (W) x 1.8 m (D) x 2 m (H), providing a total growth area of 4.5 m2 with 40-cm high clearance. The dimensions of the growth area and height can be flexibly changed. Fluorescent lights with large reflectors provided a relatively spatially uniform photosynthetically active radiation intensity of 140-250 μmoles/m2/sec. A portable air conditioner provided an ample cooling capacity, and a cooling water mister acted as a powerful humidifier. Temperature, relative humidity, and light cycle inside the chamber were controlled via a z-wave home automation system, which allowed the environmental parameters to be monitored and programmed through the internet. In our setting, the temperature was tightly controlled: 22.2°C±0.8°C. The one-hour average relative humidity was maintained at 75%±7% with short spikes up to ±15%. Using the interaction between Arabidopsis and one of its bacterial pathogens as a test experimental system, we demonstrate that experimental results produced in our chamber were highly comparable to those obtained in a commercial growth chamber. In summary, our design of an inexpensive plant growth chamber will tremendously increase research opportunities in experimental plant biology.

Indexed as

Environment, ControlledPlant DevelopmentPlantsHumidityLightTemperature

Identifiers

PMID25965420
PMCPMC4428828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.