Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25965164›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2015

Non-genetic cancer cell plasticity and therapy-induced stemness in tumour relapse: 'What does not kill me strengthens me'.

A O Pisco, S Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 177 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
177citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

177 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Radiation-induced cellular plasticity primes glioblastoma for forskolin-mediated differentiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. [Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2025
    Article

117 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A O Pisco1] Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, USA [2] Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
S Huang1] Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, USA [2] Institute for Biocomplexity and Informatics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.

Funding

Dynamics of Non-equalibrium Cell State Transitions in Cell PopulationsR01GM109964 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI HUANG, SUI · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NON-GENETIC CELL HETEROGENEITY IN TUMOR EVOLUTIONR21CA123284 · NCI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI HUANG, SUI · 2006 to 2007
$316k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA123284NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapy resistance and tumour relapse after drug therapy are commonly explained by Darwinian selection of pre-existing drug-resistant, often stem-like cancer cells resulting from random mutations. However, the ubiquitous non-genetic heterogeneity and plasticity of tumour cell phenotype raises the question: are mutations really necessary and sufficient to promote cell phenotype changes during tumour progression? Cancer therapy inevitably spares some cancer cells, even in the absence of resistant mutants. Accumulating observations suggest that the non-killed, residual tumour cells actively acquire a new phenotype simply by exploiting their developmental potential. These surviving cells are stressed by the cytotoxic treatment, and owing to phenotype plasticity, exhibit a variety of responses. Some are pushed into nearby, latent attractor states of the gene regulatory network which resemble evolutionary ancient or early developmental gene expression programs that confer stemness and resilience. By entering such stem-like, stress-response states, the surviving cells strengthen their capacity to cope with future noxious agents. Considering non-genetic cell state dynamics and the relative ease with which surviving but stressed cells can be tipped into latent attractors provides a foundation for exploring new therapeutic approaches that seek not only to kill cancer cells but also to avoid promoting resistance and relapse that are inherently linked to the attempts to kill them.

Indexed as

Cell SurvivalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsPhenotypeSelection, GeneticSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID25965164
PMCPMC4647245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.