Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25965026›Full record

ArticleBehaviour research and therapy2015

Therapist use of Socratic questioning predicts session-to-session symptom change in cognitive therapy for depression.

Justin D Braun, Daniel R Strunk, Katherine E Sasso, Andrew A Cooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behaviour research and therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A randomized controlled trial of a smartphone-based application for the treatment of anxiety.Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2021
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Case for Translation From the Clinic to the Laboratory.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justin D BraunDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Electronic address: braun.204@osu.edu.
Daniel R StrunkDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Electronic address: strunk.20@osu.edu.
Katherine E SassoDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Electronic address: sasso.9@osu.edu.
Andrew A CooperDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Electronic address: cooper.1803@osu.edu.

Funding

The Ohio State University Center for Clinical and Translational Science (TL1)TL1RR025753 · NCRR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
NCRR NIH HHS TL1 RR025753NCRR NIH HHS TL1RR025753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Socratic questioning is a key therapeutic strategy in cognitive therapy (CT) for depression. However, little is known regarding its relation to outcome. In this study, we examine therapist use of Socratic questioning as a predictor of session-to-session symptom change. Participants were 55 depressed adults who participated in a 16-week course of CT (see Adler, Strunk, & Fazio, 2015). Socratic questioning was assessed through observer ratings of the first three sessions. Socratic ratings were disaggregated into scores reflecting within-patient and between-patient variability to facilitate an examination of the relation of within-patient Socratic questioning and session-to-session symptom change. Because we examined within-patient variability in Socratic questioning, the identification of such a relation cannot be attributed to any stable patient characteristics that might otherwise introduce a spurious relation. Within-patient Socratic questioning significantly predicted session-to-session symptom change across the early sessions, with a one standard deviation increase in Socratic-Within predicting a 1.51-point decrease in BDI-II scores in the following session. Within-patient Socratic questioning continued to predict symptom change after controlling for within-patient ratings of the therapeutic alliance (i.e., Relationship and Agreement), suggesting that the relation of Socratic questioning and symptom change was not only independent of stable characteristics, but also within-patient variation in the alliance. Our results provide the first empirical support for a relation of therapist use of Socratic questioning and symptom change in CT for depression.

Indexed as

Professional-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAgedCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalSymptom AssessmentTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCognitive therapyDepressionSocratic questioningTherapeutic alliance

Identifiers

PMID25965026
PMCPMC4449800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.