Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25964923›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2014

National dissemination of chronic disease self-management education programs: an incremental examination of delivery characteristics.

Matthew Lee Smith, Marcia G Ory, SangNam Ahn, Kristie P Kulinski, Luohua Jiang, Scott Horel, Kate Lorig

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03993574 (Feasibility of a Stroke Specific Self-management Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03993574 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility of a Stroke Specific Self-management Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonRan2019 to 2022Enrolled28ConditionsStroke, Chronic ConditionsArmsSelf- management program, Standard care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Evaluating the Implementation of the Diabetes Self-Management Program in a Rural Population.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew Lee SmithDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavior, College of Public Health, The University of Georgia , Athens, GA , USA.
Marcia G OryDepartment of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences, Texas A&M Health Science Center, School of Public Health , College Station, TX , USA.
SangNam AhnDepartment of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences, Texas A&M Health Science Center, School of Public Health , College Station, TX , USA ; Division of Health Systems Management and Policy, School of Public Health, The University of Memphis , Memphis, TN , USA.
Kristie P KulinskiNational Council on Aging , Washington, DC , USA.
Luohua JiangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Texas A&M Health Science Center, School of Public Health , College Station, TX , USA.
Scott HorelDepartment of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences, Texas A&M Health Science Center, School of Public Health , College Station, TX , USA.
Kate LorigDepartment of Medicine, Stanford Patient Education Research Center, Stanford School of Medicine , Palo Alto, CA , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With a near 20-year developmental history as an evidence-based program, the suite of Chronic Disease Self-Management Education (CDSME) programs were selected in 2010 for grand-scale dissemination in a federally supported initiative to improve the health of older Americans. The primary charge of this national effort was to establish a sustainable program delivery system for empowering American adults with one or more chronic conditions to better manage their health. The current study focused on a series of dissemination and implementation science research questions to: (1) examine the geographic distribution of participation in this initiative across the Unites States; (2) describe workshop characteristics engaged to reach program participants in various settings; and (3) describe personal characteristics of the first 100,000 participants. Each subsequent entering cohort was descriptively examined to indicate whether there was constancy or change in delivery sites and populations reached over time. Findings show a strengthening of the workshop delivery infrastructure in that it took 9.4 months to reach the first 25,000 participants in 853 counties compared to 5.4 months to reach the last 25,000 participants in 1,109 counties. The workshop delivery characteristics and participant characteristics remained relatively consistent across increments of 25,000 participants reached, although general trends were observed for some variables. For example, after reaching the first 25,000 participants, subsequent groups of 25,000 participants were reached more quickly. Additionally, workshops were increasingly delivered in ZIP Codes with higher percentages of families residing below the federal poverty line. As more participants were reached, more participants with chronic conditions were enrolled. This national translational study illustrates the rapid expansion of CDSME programs throughout the United States and capability to reach diverse populations in a variety of settings.

Indexed as

chronic disease self-managementevaluationevidence-based programolder adultsprogram implementationprogram reachsustainability

Identifiers

PMID25964923
PMCPMC4410345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.